From: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [FIO PATCH] engines/io_uring: delete fio_option_is_set() calls when submitting sqes
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:16:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
The fio_option_is_set() call in fio_ioring_prep() is time-consuming,
which will reduce sqe's submit rate drastically. To fix this issue,
add two new variables to record whether ioprio_class or ioprio_set
is set. I use a simple fio job to evaluate the performance:
fio -name=fiotest -filename=/dev/nvme0n1 -iodepth=4 -thread -rw=read
-ioengine=io_uring -hipri=0 -sqthread_poll=0 -direct=1 -bs=4k -size=10G
-numjobs=1 -time_based -runtime=120
Before this patch:
READ: bw=969MiB/s (1016MB/s), 969MiB/s-969MiB/s (1016MB/s-1016MB/s),
io=114GiB (122GB), run=120001-120001msec
With this patch:
READ: bw=1259MiB/s (1320MB/s), 1259MiB/s-1259MiB/s (1320MB/s-1320MB/s),
io=148GiB (158GB), run=120001-120001msec
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
---
engines/io_uring.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/engines/io_uring.c b/engines/io_uring.c
index 1efc6cf..ac57af8 100644
--- a/engines/io_uring.c
+++ b/engines/io_uring.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct ioring_data {
int queued;
int cq_ring_off;
unsigned iodepth;
+ bool ioprio_class_set;
+ bool ioprio_set;
struct ioring_mmap mmap[3];
};
@@ -233,9 +235,9 @@ static int fio_ioring_prep(struct thread_data *td, struct io_u *io_u)
}
if (!td->o.odirect && o->uncached)
sqe->rw_flags = RWF_UNCACHED;
- if (fio_option_is_set(&td->o, ioprio_class))
+ if (ld->ioprio_class_set)
sqe->ioprio = td->o.ioprio_class << 13;
- if (fio_option_is_set(&td->o, ioprio))
+ if (ld->ioprio_set)
sqe->ioprio |= td->o.ioprio;
sqe->off = io_u->offset;
} else if (ddir_sync(io_u->ddir)) {
@@ -685,6 +687,12 @@ static int fio_ioring_init(struct thread_data *td)
td_verror(td, EINVAL, "fio_io_uring_init");
return 1;
}
+
+ if (fio_option_is_set(&td->o, ioprio_class))
+ ld->ioprio_class_set = true;
+ if (fio_option_is_set(&td->o, ioprio))
+ ld->ioprio_set = true;
+
return 0;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-12 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-12 11:16 Xiaoguang Wang [this message]
2020-03-12 12:59 ` [FIO PATCH] engines/io_uring: delete fio_option_is_set() calls when submitting sqes Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200312111617.7384-1-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox