public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:21:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

We added this for just the regular poll requests in commit a6ba632d2c24
("io_uring: retry poll if we got woken with non-matching mask"), we
should do the same for the poll handler used pollable async requests.
Move the re-wait check and arm into a helper, and call it from
io_async_task_func() as well.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 0d1b5d5f1251..7b41f6231955 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4156,6 +4156,26 @@ static int __io_async_wake(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll,
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static bool io_poll_rewait(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll)
+	__acquires(&req->ctx->completion_lock)
+{
+	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+
+	if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) {
+		struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = poll->events };
+
+		req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & poll->events;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
+	if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) {
+		add_wait_queue(poll->head, &poll->wait);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_work);
@@ -4164,14 +4184,16 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb)
 
 	trace_io_uring_task_run(req->ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&req->apoll->poll.wait.entry));
-
-	if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node)) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-		hash_del(&req->hash_node);
+	if (io_poll_rewait(req, &apoll->poll)) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
+		return;
 	}
 
+	if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node))
+		hash_del(&req->hash_node);
+
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
+
 	/* restore ->work in case we need to retry again */
 	memcpy(&req->work, &apoll->work, sizeof(req->work));
 
@@ -4436,18 +4458,11 @@ static void io_poll_task_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 	struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
 
-	if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) {
-		struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = poll->events };
-
-		req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & poll->events;
-	}
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) {
-		add_wait_queue(poll->head, &poll->wait);
+	if (io_poll_rewait(req, poll)) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
 		return;
 	}
+
 	hash_del(&req->hash_node);
 	io_poll_complete(req, req->result, 0);
 	req->flags |= REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED;
-- 
2.26.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-13 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-13 17:21 [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe
2020-04-13 17:21 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: io_async_task_func() should check and honor cancelation Jens Axboe
2020-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-13 17:26 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Jens Axboe
2020-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox