From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Yan Zhao <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>,
Jason Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Felix Kuehling <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Zhenyu Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
Alex Deucher <[email protected]>,
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
Zhi Wang <[email protected]>,
Al Viro <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] i915/gvt/kvm: a NULL ->mm does not mean a thread is a kthread
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:00:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414000410.GE10586@joy-OptiPlex-7040>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:04:10PM -0400, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > I can't think of another way for a kernel thread to have a mm indeed.
> for example, before calling to vfio_dma_rw(), a kernel thread has already
> called use_mm(), then its current->mm is not null, and it has flag
> PF_KTHREAD.
> in this case, we just want to allow the copy_to_user() directly if
> current->mm == mm, rather than call another use_mm() again.
>
> do you think it makes sense?
I mean no other way than using use_mm. That being said nesting
potentional use_mm callers sounds like a rather bad idea, and we
should avoid that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-04 9:40 improve use_mm / unuse_mm Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-04 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] amdgpu: a NULL ->mm does not mean a thread is a kthread Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-06 16:07 ` Felix Kuehling
2020-04-04 9:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] i915/gvt/kvm: " Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-04 10:05 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-04-07 3:08 ` Yan Zhao
2020-04-13 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 0:04 ` Yan Zhao
2020-04-14 7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-04-14 7:03 ` Yan Zhao
2020-04-04 9:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] i915/gvt: remove unused xen bits Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 1:44 ` Zhenyu Wang
2020-04-13 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 3:04 ` Zhenyu Wang
2020-04-04 9:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] kernel: move use_mm/unuse_mm to kthread.c Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-06 16:09 ` Felix Kuehling
2020-04-04 9:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] kernel: better document the use_mm/unuse_mm API contract Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-04 13:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pavel Begunkov
2020-04-06 16:10 ` Felix Kuehling
2020-04-04 9:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] kernel: set USER_DS in kthread_use_mm Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-06 21:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox