From: Jeremy Allison <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>,
Samba Technical <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Data Corruption bug with Samba's vfs_iouring and Linux 5.6.7/5.7rc3
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 09:48:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507164802.GB25085@jeremy-acer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:43:17AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> Replying here, as I missed the storm yesterday... The reason why it's
> different is that later kernels no longer attempt to prevent the short
> reads. They happen when you get overlapping buffered IO. Then one sqe
> will find that X of the Y range is already in cache, and return that.
> We don't retry the latter blocking. We previously did, but there was
> a few issues with it:
>
> - You're redoing the whole IO, which means more copying
>
> - It's not safe to retry, it'll depend on the file type. For socket,
> pipe, etc we obviously cannot. This is the real reason it got disabled,
> as it was broken there.
>
> Just like for regular system calls, applications must be able to deal
> with short IO.
Thanks, that's a helpful definitive reply. Of course, the SMB3
protocol is designed to deal with short IO replies as well, and
the Samba and linux kernel clients are well-enough written that
they do so. MacOS and Windows however..
Unfortunately they're the most popular clients on the planet,
so we'll probably have to fix Samba to never return short IOs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 10:04 Data Corruption bug with Samba's vfs_iouring and Linux 5.6.7/5.7rc3 Stefan Metzmacher
2020-05-05 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-05 15:44 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-05 16:53 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-05 17:39 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-05 17:48 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-05-05 17:50 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2020-05-06 10:33 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-05-06 10:41 ` Stefan Metzmacher
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2020-05-06 14:08 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-05-06 14:43 ` Andreas Schneider
2020-05-06 14:46 ` Andreas Schneider
2020-05-06 15:06 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-05-06 17:03 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-05-06 17:13 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-05-06 18:01 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-05-05 20:19 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-05-06 12:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-06 15:20 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-05-06 15:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-07 16:43 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 16:48 ` Jeremy Allison [this message]
2020-05-07 16:50 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 18:31 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-05-07 18:35 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 18:55 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-05-07 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200507164802.GB25085@jeremy-acer \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox