public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clay Harris <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Bijan Mottahedeh <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: call statx directly
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 18:39:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Tue, May 26 2020 at 16:59:23 -0600, Jens Axboe quoth thus:

> On 5/22/20 10:31 PM, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote:
> > v1 -> v2
> > 
> > - Separate statx and open in io_kiocb 
> > - Remove external declarations for unused statx interfaces
> > 
> > This patch set is a fix for the liburing statx test failure.
> > 
> > The test fails with a "Miscompare between io_uring and statx" error
> > because the statx system call path has additional processing in vfs_statx():
> > 
> >         stat->result_mask |= STATX_MNT_ID;
> >         if (path.mnt->mnt_root == path.dentry)
> >                 stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT;
> >         stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT;
> > 
> > which then results in different result_mask values.
> > 
> > Allowing the system call to be invoked directly simplifies the io_uring
> > interface and avoids potential future incompatibilities.  I'm not sure
> > if there was other reasoning fort not doing so initially.
> > 
> > One issue I cannot account for is the difference in "used" memory reported
> > by free(1) after running the statx a large (10000) number of times.
> > 
> > The difference is significant ~100k and doesn't really change after
> > dropping caches.
> > 
> > I enabled memory leak detection and couldn't see anything related to the test.
> > 
> > Bijan Mottahedeh (4):
> >   io_uring: add io_statx structure
> >   statx: allow system call to be invoked from io_uring
> >   io_uring: call statx directly
> >   statx: hide interfaces no longer used by io_uring
> > 
> >  fs/internal.h |  4 ++--
> >  fs/io_uring.c | 72 +++++++++++++++--------------------------------------------
> >  fs/stat.c     | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks, this looks better. For a bit of history, the initial attempt was
> to do the statx without async offload if we could do so without blocking.
> Without that, we may as well simplify it.

I was thinking that there may be use cases for allowing IOSQE_FIXED_FILE +
AT_EMPTY_PATH.  This sounds like it would make such a thing more difficult.

> -- 
> Jens Axboe

      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-23  4:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: call statx directly Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23  4:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] io_uring: add io_statx structure Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23  4:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] statx: allow system call to be invoked from io_uring Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23  4:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] io_uring: call statx directly Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23  4:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] statx: hide interfaces no longer used by io_uring Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-26 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: call statx directly Jens Axboe
2020-05-26 23:39   ` Clay Harris [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526233903.qbzrbqgfhlhe62pr@ps29521.dreamhostps.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox