From: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected],
Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:41:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
If requests can be submitted and completed inline, we don't need to
initialize whole io_wq_work in io_init_req(), which is an expensive
operation, add a new 'REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED' to determine whether
io_wq_work is initialized and add a helper io_req_init_async(), users
must call io_req_init_async() for the first time touching any members
of io_wq_work.
I use /dev/nullb0 to evaluate performance improvement in my physical
machine:
modprobe null_blk nr_devices=1 completion_nsec=0
sudo taskset -c 60 fio -name=fiotest -filename=/dev/nullb0 -iodepth=128
-thread -rw=read -ioengine=io_uring -direct=1 -bs=4k -size=100G -numjobs=1
-time_based -runtime=120
before this patch:
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=724MiB/s (759MB/s), 724MiB/s-724MiB/s (759MB/s-759MB/s),
io=84.8GiB (91.1GB), run=120001-120001msec
With this patch:
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=761MiB/s (798MB/s), 761MiB/s-761MiB/s (798MB/s-798MB/s),
io=89.2GiB (95.8GB), run=120001-120001msec
About 5% improvement.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
---
V4:
add io_req_init_async() helper
V5:
refactor io_req_init_async() to io_init_req_work() and io_init_req_work_func
in case we need to change io_wq_work.func separately.
V6:
Drop the refactor work in V5, and rebase to io_uring-5.8.
V7:
drop 'creds' in struct io_kiocb, as suggested by Pavel.
---
fs/io-wq.h | 5 -----
fs/io_uring.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.h b/fs/io-wq.h
index 2db24d31fbc5..8e138fa88b9f 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.h
+++ b/fs/io-wq.h
@@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ struct io_wq_work {
pid_t task_pid;
};
-#define INIT_IO_WORK(work) \
- do { \
- *(work) = (struct io_wq_work){}; \
- } while (0) \
-
static inline struct io_wq_work *wq_next_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
{
if (!work->list.next)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 3ffe03194c1e..2e906914f573 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ enum {
REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED_BIT,
REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE_BIT,
REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT_BIT,
+ REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED_BIT,
/* not a real bit, just to check we're not overflowing the space */
__REQ_F_LAST_BIT,
@@ -599,6 +600,8 @@ enum {
REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE = BIT(REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE_BIT),
/* needs to queue linked timeout */
REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT = BIT(REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT_BIT),
+ /* io_wq_work is initialized */
+ REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED = BIT(REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED_BIT),
};
struct async_poll {
@@ -911,6 +914,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(io_uring_get_socket);
static void io_file_put_work(struct work_struct *work);
+/*
+ * Note: must call io_req_init_async() for the first time you
+ * touch any members of io_wq_work.
+ */
+static inline void io_req_init_async(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED)
+ return;
+
+ memset(&req->work, 0, sizeof(req->work));
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED;
+}
+
static inline bool io_async_submit(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
return ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL;
@@ -1037,6 +1053,9 @@ static inline void io_req_work_grab_env(struct io_kiocb *req,
static inline void io_req_work_drop_env(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
+ if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED))
+ return;
+
if (req->work.mm) {
mmdrop(req->work.mm);
req->work.mm = NULL;
@@ -2781,8 +2800,14 @@ static int __io_splice_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
return ret;
req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
- if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(sp->file_in)->i_mode))
+ if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(sp->file_in)->i_mode)) {
+ /*
+ * Splice operation will be punted aync, and here need to
+ * modify io_wq_work.flags, so initialize io_wq_work firstly.
+ */
+ io_req_init_async(req);
req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -3368,8 +3393,10 @@ static int io_close_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
/*
* If we queue this for async, it must not be cancellable. That would
- * leave the 'file' in an undeterminate state.
+ * leave the 'file' in an undeterminate state, and here need to modify
+ * io_wq_work.flags, so initialize io_wq_work firstly.
*/
+ io_req_init_async(req);
req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL;
if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & (IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL|IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)))
@@ -4847,6 +4874,8 @@ static int io_req_defer_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
if (!sqe)
return 0;
+ io_req_init_async(req);
+
if (io_op_defs[req->opcode].file_table) {
ret = io_grab_files(req);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -5501,7 +5530,8 @@ static void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
again:
linked_timeout = io_prep_linked_timeout(req);
- if (req->work.creds && req->work.creds != current_cred()) {
+ if ((req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED) && req->work.creds &&
+ req->work.creds != current_cred()) {
if (old_creds)
revert_creds(old_creds);
if (old_creds == req->work.creds)
@@ -5524,6 +5554,8 @@ static void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
goto exit;
}
punt:
+ io_req_init_async(req);
+
if (io_op_defs[req->opcode].file_table) {
ret = io_grab_files(req);
if (ret)
@@ -5776,7 +5808,6 @@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
refcount_set(&req->refs, 2);
req->task = NULL;
req->result = 0;
- INIT_IO_WORK(&req->work);
if (unlikely(req->opcode >= IORING_OP_LAST))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -5798,6 +5829,7 @@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
id = READ_ONCE(sqe->personality);
if (id) {
+ io_req_init_async(req);
req->work.creds = idr_find(&ctx->personality_idr, id);
if (unlikely(!req->work.creds))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.17.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 11:41 Xiaoguang Wang [this message]
2020-06-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] io_uring: avoid unnecessary io_wq_work copy for fast poll feature Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-11 1:19 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200610114120.7518-1-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox