public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 17:24:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

In io_complete_rw_iopoll(), stores to io_kiocb's result and iopoll
completed are two independent store operations, to ensure that once
iopoll_completed is ture and then req->result must been perceived by
the cpu executing io_do_iopoll(), proper memory barrier should be used.

And in io_do_iopoll(), we check whether req->result is EAGAIN, if it is,
we'll need to issue this io request using io-wq again. In order to just
issue a single smp_rmb() on the completion side, move the re-submit work
to io_iopoll_complete().

Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index a3119fecfe40..5ba4d770081f 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1728,6 +1728,18 @@ static int io_put_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	return cflags;
 }
 
+static void io_iopoll_queue(struct list_head *again)
+{
+	struct io_kiocb *req;
+
+	do {
+		req = list_first_entry(again, struct io_kiocb, list);
+		list_del(&req->list);
+		refcount_inc(&req->refs);
+		io_queue_async_work(req);
+	} while (!list_empty(again));
+}
+
 /*
  * Find and free completed poll iocbs
  */
@@ -1736,11 +1748,20 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 {
 	struct req_batch rb;
 	struct io_kiocb *req;
+	LIST_HEAD(again);
+
+	/* order with ->result store in io_complete_rw_iopoll() */
+	smp_rmb();
 
 	rb.to_free = rb.need_iter = 0;
 	while (!list_empty(done)) {
 		int cflags = 0;
 
+		if (READ_ONCE(req->result) == -EAGAIN) {
+			req->iopoll_completed = 0;
+			list_move_tail(&req->list, &again);
+			continue;
+		}
 		req = list_first_entry(done, struct io_kiocb, list);
 		list_del(&req->list);
 
@@ -1759,18 +1780,9 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)
 		io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
 	io_free_req_many(ctx, &rb);
-}
 
-static void io_iopoll_queue(struct list_head *again)
-{
-	struct io_kiocb *req;
-
-	do {
-		req = list_first_entry(again, struct io_kiocb, list);
-		list_del(&req->list);
-		refcount_inc(&req->refs);
-		io_queue_async_work(req);
-	} while (!list_empty(again));
+	if (!list_empty(&again))
+		io_iopoll_queue(&again);
 }
 
 static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
@@ -1778,7 +1790,6 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *req, *tmp;
 	LIST_HEAD(done);
-	LIST_HEAD(again);
 	bool spin;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1804,13 +1815,6 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 		if (!list_empty(&done))
 			break;
 
-		if (req->result == -EAGAIN) {
-			list_move_tail(&req->list, &again);
-			continue;
-		}
-		if (!list_empty(&again))
-			break;
-
 		ret = kiocb->ki_filp->f_op->iopoll(kiocb, spin);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
@@ -1823,9 +1827,6 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 	if (!list_empty(&done))
 		io_iopoll_complete(ctx, nr_events, &done);
 
-	if (!list_empty(&again))
-		io_iopoll_queue(&again);
-
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1976,9 +1977,11 @@ static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res, long res2)
 
 	if (res != -EAGAIN && res != req->result)
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
-	req->result = res;
-	if (res != -EAGAIN)
-		WRITE_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed, 1);
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(req->result, res);
+	/* order with io_poll_complete() checking ->result */
+	smp_wmb();
+	WRITE_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed, 1);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-15  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15  9:24 [PATCH 0/2] add proper memory barrier for IOPOLL mode Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-15  9:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: don't fail links for EAGAIN error in " Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-15  9:24 ` Xiaoguang Wang [this message]
2020-06-15 14:36   ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed Jens Axboe
2020-06-15 14:48     ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-15 15:02       ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-15 15:09         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-15 15:32         ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-15 15:35           ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-15 16:51             ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-15 17:53               ` Xiaoguang Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200615092450.3241-3-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox