* [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers @ 2020-06-27 5:55 Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 5:59 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-27 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring; +Cc: Hrvoje Zeba Since b9c0bf79aa8, liburing.h doesn't compile with C++ compilers. C++ provides it's own <atomic> interface and <stdatomic.h> can't be used. This is a minimal change to use <atomic> variants where needed. Signed-off-by: Hrvoje Zeba <[email protected]> --- src/include/liburing.h | 18 ++++++++++-------- src/include/liburing/barrier.h | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/include/liburing.h b/src/include/liburing.h index c9034fc..2bb6efd 100644 --- a/src/include/liburing.h +++ b/src/include/liburing.h @@ -2,10 +2,6 @@ #ifndef LIB_URING_H #define LIB_URING_H -#ifdef __cplusplus -extern "C" { -#endif - #include <sys/socket.h> #include <sys/uio.h> #include <sys/stat.h> @@ -15,9 +11,15 @@ extern "C" { #include <inttypes.h> #include <time.h> #include <linux/swab.h> + +#include "liburing/barrier.h" + +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" { +#endif + #include "liburing/compat.h" #include "liburing/io_uring.h" -#include "liburing/barrier.h" /* * Library interface to io_uring @@ -40,11 +42,11 @@ struct io_uring_sq { }; struct io_uring_cq { - unsigned *khead; - unsigned *ktail; + atomic_uint *khead; + atomic_uint *ktail; unsigned *kring_mask; unsigned *kring_entries; - unsigned *kflags; + atomic_uint *kflags; unsigned *koverflow; struct io_uring_cqe *cqes; diff --git a/src/include/liburing/barrier.h b/src/include/liburing/barrier.h index c8aa421..8f422eb 100644 --- a/src/include/liburing/barrier.h +++ b/src/include/liburing/barrier.h @@ -2,7 +2,15 @@ #ifndef LIBURING_BARRIER_H #define LIBURING_BARRIER_H +#ifdef __cplusplus +#include <atomic> +using std::atomic_uint; +using std::memory_order_release; +using std::memory_order_acquire; +using std::memory_order_relaxed; +#else #include <stdatomic.h> +#endif /* From the kernel documentation file refcount-vs-atomic.rst: -- 2.27.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers 2020-06-27 5:55 [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-27 5:59 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-27 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 1:55 AM Hrvoje Zeba <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since b9c0bf79aa8, liburing.h doesn't compile with C++ compilers. C++ > provides it's own <atomic> interface and <stdatomic.h> can't be used. This > is a minimal change to use <atomic> variants where needed. > I've tested this with gcc 10.1.0 and clang 10.0.0 and did some limited testing. Seemed fine but somebody more knowledgeable should also take a look. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers 2020-06-27 5:55 [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 5:59 ` Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-27 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-27 15:39 ` Hrvoje Zeba 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bart Van Assche @ 2020-06-27 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hrvoje Zeba, io-uring On 2020-06-26 22:55, Hrvoje Zeba wrote: > Since b9c0bf79aa8, liburing.h doesn't compile with C++ compilers. C++ > provides it's own <atomic> interface and <stdatomic.h> can't be used. This > is a minimal change to use <atomic> variants where needed. I was not aware that liburing supports C++ compilers? > struct io_uring_cq { > - unsigned *khead; > - unsigned *ktail; > + atomic_uint *khead; > + atomic_uint *ktail; I think this is the wrong way to make liburing again compatible with C++ compilers. Changing these data types causes all dereferences of these pointers to be translated by the compiler into sequentially consistent atomic instructions. I expect this patch to have a negative impact on the performance of liburing. Bart. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers 2020-06-27 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche @ 2020-06-27 15:39 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-27 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bart Van Assche; +Cc: io-uring On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2020-06-26 22:55, Hrvoje Zeba wrote: > > Since b9c0bf79aa8, liburing.h doesn't compile with C++ compilers. C++ > > provides it's own <atomic> interface and <stdatomic.h> can't be used. This > > is a minimal change to use <atomic> variants where needed. > > I was not aware that liburing supports C++ compilers? > Why is this there then? https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/liburing/tree/src/include/liburing.h#n6 > > struct io_uring_cq { > > - unsigned *khead; > > - unsigned *ktail; > > + atomic_uint *khead; > > + atomic_uint *ktail; > > I think this is the wrong way to make liburing again compatible with > C++ compilers. Changing these data types causes all dereferences of > these pointers to be translated by the compiler into sequentially > consistent atomic instructions. I expect this patch to have a > negative impact on the performance of liburing. > Any suggestions? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers 2020-06-27 15:39 ` Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-27 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-27 16:42 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-28 13:35 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Bart Van Assche @ 2020-06-27 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hrvoje Zeba; +Cc: io-uring [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 125 bytes --] On 2020-06-27 08:39, Hrvoje Zeba wrote: > Any suggestions? How about the two attached (untested) patches? Thanks, Bart. [-- Attachment #2: 0001-Make-the-liburing-header-files-again-compatible-with.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2962 bytes --] From 2d6b8423ece7f00798d73ede08719d4da6abbd46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:40:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH liburing 1/2] Make the liburing header files again compatible with C++ This patch has been tested by inspecting the output of the following command: g++ -I src/include -c -Wall -Wextra src/*.c Fixes: b9c0bf79aa87 ("src/include/liburing/barrier.h: Use C11 atomics") # . Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> --- src/include/liburing.h | 8 ++++---- src/include/liburing/barrier.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/include/liburing.h b/src/include/liburing.h index c9034fc0df1b..76e2b854f957 100644 --- a/src/include/liburing.h +++ b/src/include/liburing.h @@ -2,10 +2,6 @@ #ifndef LIB_URING_H #define LIB_URING_H -#ifdef __cplusplus -extern "C" { -#endif - #include <sys/socket.h> #include <sys/uio.h> #include <sys/stat.h> @@ -19,6 +15,10 @@ extern "C" { #include "liburing/io_uring.h" #include "liburing/barrier.h" +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" { +#endif + /* * Library interface to io_uring */ diff --git a/src/include/liburing/barrier.h b/src/include/liburing/barrier.h index c8aa4210371c..5ad337f33262 100644 --- a/src/include/liburing/barrier.h +++ b/src/include/liburing/barrier.h @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ #ifndef LIBURING_BARRIER_H #define LIBURING_BARRIER_H -#include <stdatomic.h> - /* From the kernel documentation file refcount-vs-atomic.rst: @@ -23,6 +21,40 @@ after the acquire operation executes. This is implemented using :c:func:`smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep`. */ +#ifdef __cplusplus +#include <atomic> + +template <typename T> +static inline void IO_URING_WRITE_ONCE(T &var, T val) +{ + std::atomic_store_explicit(reinterpret_cast<std::atomic<T> *>(&var), + val, std::memory_order_relaxed); +} +template <typename T> +static inline T IO_URING_READ_ONCE(const T &var) +{ + return std::atomic_load_explicit( + reinterpret_cast<const std::atomic<T> *>(&var), + std::memory_order_relaxed); +} + +template <typename T> +static inline void io_uring_smp_store_release(T *p, T v) +{ + std::atomic_store_explicit(reinterpret_cast<std::atomic<T> *>(p), v, + std::memory_order_release); +} + +template <typename T> +static inline T io_uring_smp_load_acquire(const T *p) +{ + return std::atomic_load_explicit( + reinterpret_cast<const std::atomic<T> *>(p), + std::memory_order_acquire); +} +#else +#include <stdatomic.h> + #define IO_URING_WRITE_ONCE(var, val) \ atomic_store_explicit(&(var), (val), memory_order_relaxed) #define IO_URING_READ_ONCE(var) \ @@ -32,5 +64,6 @@ after the acquire operation executes. This is implemented using atomic_store_explicit((p), (v), memory_order_release) #define io_uring_smp_load_acquire(p) \ atomic_load_explicit((p), memory_order_acquire) +#endif #endif /* defined(LIBURING_BARRIER_H) */ [-- Attachment #3: 0002-Add-a-C-unit-test.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2740 bytes --] From 0b896d7bf992caadde8f0c4d57478800b2261507 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:09:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH liburing 2/2] Add a C++ unit test Since the liburing header files support C++ compilers, add a C++ unit test. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> --- test/Makefile | 9 +++++++-- test/sq-full-cpp.cc | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 test/sq-full-cpp.cc diff --git a/test/Makefile b/test/Makefile index e103296fabdd..8b81d2d5f67c 100644 --- a/test/Makefile +++ b/test/Makefile @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ override CFLAGS += -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare\ -I../src/include/ -include ../config-host.h all_targets += poll poll-cancel ring-leak fsync io_uring_setup io_uring_register \ - io_uring_enter nop sq-full cq-full 35fa71a030ca-test \ + io_uring_enter nop sq-full sq-full-cpp cq-full \ + 35fa71a030ca-test \ 917257daa0fe-test b19062a56726-test eeed8b54e0df-test link \ send_recvmsg a4c0b3decb33-test 500f9fbadef8-test timeout \ sq-space_left stdout cq-ready cq-peek-batch file-register \ @@ -41,8 +42,12 @@ all: $(all_targets) %: %.c $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $< -luring $(XCFLAGS) +%: %.cc + $(QUIET_CC)$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $< -luring $(XCFLAGS) + test_srcs := poll.c poll-cancel.c ring-leak.c fsync.c io_uring_setup.c \ - io_uring_register.c io_uring_enter.c nop.c sq-full.c cq-full.c \ + io_uring_register.c io_uring_enter.c nop.c sq-full.c sq-full-cpp.cc \ + cq-full.c \ 35fa71a030ca-test.c 917257daa0fe-test.c b19062a56726-test.c \ eeed8b54e0df-test.c link.c send_recvmsg.c a4c0b3decb33-test.c \ 500f9fbadef8-test.c timeout.c sq-space_left.c stdout.c cq-ready.c\ diff --git a/test/sq-full-cpp.cc b/test/sq-full-cpp.cc new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ba400996e615 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/sq-full-cpp.cc @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ +/* + * Description: test SQ queue full condition + * + */ +#include <errno.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <fcntl.h> + +#include "liburing.h" + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + struct io_uring_sqe *sqe; + struct io_uring ring; + int ret, i; + + if (argc > 1) + return 0; + + ret = io_uring_queue_init(8, &ring, 0); + if (ret) { + fprintf(stderr, "ring setup failed: %d\n", ret); + return 1; + + } + + i = 0; + while ((sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(&ring)) != NULL) + i++; + + if (i != 8) { + fprintf(stderr, "Got %d SQEs, wanted 8\n", i); + goto err; + } + + io_uring_queue_exit(&ring); + return 0; +err: + io_uring_queue_exit(&ring); + return 1; +} ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers 2020-06-27 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche @ 2020-06-27 16:42 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-28 13:35 ` Jens Axboe 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-27 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bart Van Assche; +Cc: io-uring On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 12:23 PM Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2020-06-27 08:39, Hrvoje Zeba wrote: > > Any suggestions? > > How about the two attached (untested) patches? > Tested on my end, looks good. Thank you! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers 2020-06-27 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-27 16:42 ` Hrvoje Zeba @ 2020-06-28 13:35 ` Jens Axboe 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-06-28 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bart Van Assche, Hrvoje Zeba; +Cc: io-uring On 6/27/20 10:23 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 2020-06-27 08:39, Hrvoje Zeba wrote: >> Any suggestions? > > How about the two attached (untested) patches? Bart, this looks good to me. I've pushed out a change to detect if we have C++ on the system, as I don't want to make it a hard requirement. When you send these out "officially", can you make the addition of the sq-full-cpp dependent on CONFIG_HAVE_CXX in test/Makefile? -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-28 13:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-06-27 5:55 [RFC PATCH] Fix usage of stdatomic.h for C++ compilers Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 5:59 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-27 15:39 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-27 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-27 16:42 ` Hrvoje Zeba 2020-06-28 13:35 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox