From: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
To: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>,
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>, Kees Cook <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>,
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>,
Jann Horn <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
Linux API <[email protected]>,
Linux FS Devel <[email protected]>,
LKML <[email protected]>,
Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: strace of io_uring events?
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:37:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXAxFzuRB5EJZR7bbgfrEcNc=9_E7wwhPaZ3YGJ1=DZ0w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 2020-07-21 10:23:22 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Andres, how final is your Postgres branch?
Not final at all. Some of the constraints like needing to submit/receive
completions to/from multiple processes are pretty immovable though.
> I'm wondering if we could get away with requiring a special flag when
> creating an io_uring to indicate that you intend to submit IO from
> outside the creating mm.
Perhaps. It'd need to be clear when we need to do so, as we certainly
won't want to move the minimal kernel version further up.
But I think postgres is far from the only use case for wanting the
submitting mm to be the relevant one, not the creating one. It seems far
more dangerous to use the creating mm than the submitting mm. Makes
things like passing a uring fd with a few pre-opened files to another
process impossible.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 11:12 strace of io_uring events? Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-15 14:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-15 17:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-15 19:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-15 20:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-15 20:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-15 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 13:14 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-16 15:12 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-17 8:01 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-21 15:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 15:31 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-21 17:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 17:30 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-21 17:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 18:39 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-21 19:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 19:48 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-21 19:56 ` Andres Freund
2020-07-21 19:37 ` Andres Freund [this message]
2020-07-21 15:58 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-23 10:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-23 13:37 ` Colin Walters
2020-07-24 7:25 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-16 13:17 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-07-16 15:19 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-17 8:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-07-16 16:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-16 0:12 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox