public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: revert consumed iov_iter bytes on error
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:33:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825123332.lb3o5ah53jar7mbw@steredhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:48:44AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Some consumers of the iov_iter will return an error, but still have
> bytes consumed in the iterator. This is an issue for -EAGAIN, since we
> rely on a sane iov_iter state across retries.
> 
> Fix this by ensuring that we revert consumed bytes, if any, if the file
> operations have consumed any bytes from iterator. This is similar to what
> generic_file_read_iter() does, and is always safe as we have the previous
> bytes count handy already.
> 
> Fixes: ff6165b2d7f6 ("io_uring: retain iov_iter state over io_read/io_write calls")
> Reported-by: Dmitry Shulyak <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index c9d526ff55e0..e030b33fa53e 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -3153,6 +3153,8 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
>  	} else if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
>  		if (!force_nonblock)
>  			goto done;
> +		/* some cases will consume bytes even on error returns */
> +		iov_iter_revert(iter, iov_count - iov_iter_count(iter));
>  		ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, inline_vecs, iter, false);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out_free;
> @@ -3294,6 +3296,8 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
>  	if (!force_nonblock || ret2 != -EAGAIN) {
>  		kiocb_done(kiocb, ret2, cs);
>  	} else {
> +		/* some cases will consume bytes even on error returns */
> +		iov_iter_revert(iter, iov_count - iov_iter_count(iter));
>  copy_iov:
>  		ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, inline_vecs, iter, false);
>  		if (!ret)
> 

What about moving iov_iter_revert() in io_setup_async_rw(), passing
iov_initial_count as parameter?

Maybe it's out of purpose since we use it even when we're not trying again.


Anyway the patch LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Stefano


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-25 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-24 17:48 [PATCH] io_uring: revert consumed iov_iter bytes on error Jens Axboe
2020-08-25 12:33 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2020-08-25 13:28   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200825123332.lb3o5ah53jar7mbw@steredhat \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox