From: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.10-rc1
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:06:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:49:01PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/13/20 1:46 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:46 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Here are the io_uring updates for 5.10.
> >
> > Very strange. My clang build gives a warning I've never seen before:
> >
> > /tmp/io_uring-dd40c4.s:26476: Warning: ignoring changed section
> > attributes for .data..read_mostly
> >
> > and looking at what clang generates for the *.s file, it seems to be
> > the "section" line in:
> >
> > .type io_op_defs,@object # @io_op_defs
> > .section .data..read_mostly,"a",@progbits
> > .p2align 4
> >
> > I think it's the combination of "const" and "__read_mostly".
> >
> > I think the warning is sensible: how can a piece of data be both
> > "const" and "__read_mostly"? If it's "const", then it's not "mostly"
> > read - it had better be _always_ read.
> >
> > I'm letting it go, and I've pulled this (gcc doesn't complain), but
> > please have a look.
>
> Huh weird, I'll take a look. FWIW, the construct isn't unique across
> the kernel.
>
> What clang are you using?
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
If const and non-const __read_mostly appeared in the same file, both gcc
and clang would give errors.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 13:46 [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.10-rc1 Jens Axboe
2020-10-13 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-13 19:49 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-13 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-13 20:49 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-10-13 21:00 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-13 21:06 ` Arvind Sankar [this message]
2020-10-14 17:43 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-10-13 19:47 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox