From: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix possible use after free to sqd
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:07:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201015110707.r77jkzema4nmsvrf@steredhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 06:46:34PM +0800, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> hi閿涳拷
>
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:13:35PM +0800, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> > > Reading codes finds a possible use after free issue to sqd:
> > > thread1 | thread2
> > > ==> io_attach_sq_data() |
> > > ===> sqd = ctx_attach->sq_data;|
> > > | ==> io_put_sq_data()
> > > | ===> refcount_dec_and_test(&sqd->refs)
> > > | If sqd->refs is zero, will free sqd.
> > > |
> > > ===> refcount_inc(&sqd->refs); |
> > > |
> > > | ====> kfree(sqd);
> > > ===> now use after free to sqd |
> > >
> >
> > IIUC the io_attach_sq_data() is called only during the setup of an
> > io_uring context, before that the fd is returned to the user space.
> Sorry I didn't make it clear in commit message.
> In io_attach_sq_data(), we'll try to attach to a previous io_uring instance
> indicated by p->wq_fd, this p->wq_fd could be closed independently.
Thanks to clarify! Got it.
Also in this case, IIUC io_put_sq_data() is called only when
io_uring_release() is invoked on the previous io_uring instance.
Since we are taking a reference with fdget at the begin of io_attach_sq_data()
and we release this reference only at the end of io_attach_sq_data(),
can io_put_sq_data() runs in another thread while we have the reference?
Thanks,
Stefano
>
> Regards,
> Xiaoguang Wang
> >
> > So, I'm not sure a second thread can call io_put_sq_data() while the
> > first thread is in io_attach_sq_data().
> >
> > Can you check if this situation can really happen?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stefano
> >
> > > Use refcount_inc_not_zero() to fix this issue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > fs/io_uring.c | 6 +++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> > > index 33b5cf18bb51..48e230feb704 100644
> > > --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> > > +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> > > @@ -6868,7 +6868,11 @@ static struct io_sq_data *io_attach_sq_data(struct io_uring_params *p)
> > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > }
> > > - refcount_inc(&sqd->refs);
> > > + if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&sqd->refs)) {
> > > + fdput(f);
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > fdput(f);
> > > return sqd;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.17.2
> > >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-15 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-15 9:13 [PATCH] io_uring: fix possible use after free to sqd Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-15 10:01 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-10-15 10:46 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-15 11:07 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2020-10-15 11:24 ` Xiaoguang Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201015110707.r77jkzema4nmsvrf@steredhat \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox