public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected],
	Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:23:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)

The first patch tries to improve various issues in current implementation:
  The prepare_to_wait() usage in __io_sq_thread() is weird. If multiple ctxs
share one same poll thread, one ctx will put poll thread in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
but if other ctxs have work to do, we don't need to change task's stat at all.
I think only if all ctxs don't have work to do, we can do it.
  We use round-robin strategy to make multiple ctxs share one same poll thread,
but there are various condition in __io_sq_thread(), which seems complicated and
may affect round-robin strategy.
  In io_sq_thread(), we always call io_sq_thread_drop_mm() when we complete a
round of ctxs iteration, which maybe inefficient.

The second patch adds a IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL_PERCPU flag, for those rings which
have SQPOLL enabled and are willing to be bound to one same cpu, hence share
one same poll thread, add a capability that these rings can share one poll thread
by specifying a new IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL_PERCPU flag. FIO tool can integrate this
feature easily, so we can test multiple rings to share same poll thread easily.

Xiaoguang Wang (2):
  io_uring: refactor io_sq_thread() handling
  io_uring: support multiple rings to share same poll thread by
    specifying same cpu

 fs/io_uring.c                 | 307 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h |   1 +
 2 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-20  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-20  8:23 Xiaoguang Wang [this message]
2020-10-20  8:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: refactor io_sq_thread() handling Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-27 16:56   ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-20  8:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: support multiple rings to share same poll thread by specifying same cpu Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-27 17:01   ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-01 14:22     ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-11-02 12:00     ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-27 13:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-27 13:48   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201020082345.19628-1-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox