From: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: refactor io_sq_thread() handling
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:15:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
There are some issues about current io_sq_thread() implementation:
1. The prepare_to_wait() usage in __io_sq_thread() is weird. If
multiple ctxs share one same poll thread, one ctx will put poll thread
in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, but if other ctxs have work to do, we don't
need to change task's stat at all. I think only if all ctxs don't have
work to do, we can do it.
2. We use round-robin strategy to make multiple ctxs share one same
poll thread, but there are various condition in __io_sq_thread(), which
seems complicated and may affect round-robin strategy.
To improve above issues, I take below actions:
1. If multiple ctxs share one same poll thread, only if all all ctxs
don't have work to do, we can call prepare_to_wait() and schedule() to
make poll thread enter sleep state.
2. To make round-robin strategy more straight, I simplify
__io_sq_thread() a bit, it just does io poll and sqes submit work once,
does not check various condition.
3. For multiple ctxs share one same poll thread, we choose the biggest
sq_thread_idle among these ctxs as timeout condition, and will update
it when ctx is in or out.
4. Not need to check EBUSY especially, if io_submit_sqes() returns
EBUSY, IORING_SQ_CQ_OVERFLOW should be set, helper in liburing should
be aware of cq overflow and enters kernel to flush work.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index badd8e70a10e..e9cde444b34d 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -244,6 +244,8 @@ struct io_sq_data {
struct task_struct *thread;
struct wait_queue_head wait;
+
+ unsigned sq_thread_idle;
};
struct io_ring_ctx {
@@ -309,7 +311,6 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
struct io_sq_data *sq_data; /* if using sq thread polling */
struct wait_queue_head sqo_sq_wait;
- struct wait_queue_entry sqo_wait_entry;
struct list_head sqd_list;
/*
@@ -6828,111 +6829,49 @@ static inline void io_ring_clear_wakeup_flag(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
}
-static int io_sq_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *wqe, unsigned mode,
- int sync, void *key)
-{
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = container_of(wqe, struct io_ring_ctx, sqo_wait_entry);
- int ret;
-
- ret = autoremove_wake_function(wqe, mode, sync, key);
- if (ret) {
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
- ctx->rings->sq_flags &= ~IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
- }
- return ret;
-}
-
-enum sq_ret {
- SQT_IDLE = 1,
- SQT_SPIN = 2,
- SQT_DID_WORK = 4,
-};
-
-static enum sq_ret __io_sq_thread(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
- unsigned long start_jiffies, bool cap_entries)
+static int __io_sq_thread(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool cap_entries)
{
- unsigned long timeout = start_jiffies + ctx->sq_thread_idle;
- struct io_sq_data *sqd = ctx->sq_data;
unsigned int to_submit;
int ret = 0;
-again:
if (!list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list)) {
unsigned nr_events = 0;
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list) && !need_resched())
+ if (!list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list))
io_do_iopoll(ctx, &nr_events, 0);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
}
to_submit = io_sqring_entries(ctx);
-
- /*
- * If submit got -EBUSY, flag us as needing the application
- * to enter the kernel to reap and flush events.
- */
- if (!to_submit || ret == -EBUSY || need_resched()) {
- /*
- * Drop cur_mm before scheduling, we can't hold it for
- * long periods (or over schedule()). Do this before
- * adding ourselves to the waitqueue, as the unuse/drop
- * may sleep.
- */
- io_sq_thread_drop_mm_files();
-
- /*
- * We're polling. If we're within the defined idle
- * period, then let us spin without work before going
- * to sleep. The exception is if we got EBUSY doing
- * more IO, we should wait for the application to
- * reap events and wake us up.
- */
- if (!list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list) || need_resched() ||
- (!time_after(jiffies, timeout) && ret != -EBUSY &&
- !percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs)))
- return SQT_SPIN;
-
- prepare_to_wait(&sqd->wait, &ctx->sqo_wait_entry,
- TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-
- /*
- * While doing polled IO, before going to sleep, we need
- * to check if there are new reqs added to iopoll_list,
- * it is because reqs may have been punted to io worker
- * and will be added to iopoll_list later, hence check
- * the iopoll_list again.
- */
- if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) &&
- !list_empty_careful(&ctx->iopoll_list)) {
- finish_wait(&sqd->wait, &ctx->sqo_wait_entry);
- goto again;
- }
-
- to_submit = io_sqring_entries(ctx);
- if (!to_submit || ret == -EBUSY)
- return SQT_IDLE;
- }
-
- finish_wait(&sqd->wait, &ctx->sqo_wait_entry);
- io_ring_clear_wakeup_flag(ctx);
-
/* if we're handling multiple rings, cap submit size for fairness */
if (cap_entries && to_submit > 8)
to_submit = 8;
- mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
- if (likely(!percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs)))
- ret = io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit);
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ if (to_submit) {
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ if (likely(!percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs)))
+ ret = io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ }
if (!io_sqring_full(ctx) && wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->sqo_sq_wait))
wake_up(&ctx->sqo_sq_wait);
- return SQT_DID_WORK;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void io_sqd_update_thread_idle(struct io_sq_data *sqd)
+{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;
+ unsigned sq_thread_idle = 0;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
+ if (sq_thread_idle < ctx->sq_thread_idle)
+ sq_thread_idle = ctx->sq_thread_idle;
+ }
+
+ sqd->sq_thread_idle = sq_thread_idle;
}
static void io_sqd_init_new(struct io_sq_data *sqd)
@@ -6941,11 +6880,11 @@ static void io_sqd_init_new(struct io_sq_data *sqd)
while (!list_empty(&sqd->ctx_new_list)) {
ctx = list_first_entry(&sqd->ctx_new_list, struct io_ring_ctx, sqd_list);
- init_wait(&ctx->sqo_wait_entry);
- ctx->sqo_wait_entry.func = io_sq_wake_function;
list_move_tail(&ctx->sqd_list, &sqd->ctx_list);
complete(&ctx->sq_thread_comp);
}
+
+ io_sqd_update_thread_idle(sqd);
}
static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
@@ -6957,7 +6896,8 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
const struct cred *old_cred = NULL;
struct io_sq_data *sqd = data;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;
- unsigned long start_jiffies;
+ unsigned long timeout;
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
task_lock(current);
current->files = NULL;
@@ -6965,10 +6905,9 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
current->thread_pid = NULL;
task_unlock(current);
- start_jiffies = jiffies;
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
- enum sq_ret ret = 0;
- bool cap_entries;
+ int ret;
+ bool cap_entries, sqt_spin, needs_sched;
/*
* Any changes to the sqd lists are synchronized through the
@@ -6978,11 +6917,13 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
if (kthread_should_park())
kthread_parkme();
- if (unlikely(!list_empty(&sqd->ctx_new_list)))
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&sqd->ctx_new_list))) {
io_sqd_init_new(sqd);
+ timeout = jiffies + sqd->sq_thread_idle;
+ }
+ sqt_spin = false;
cap_entries = !list_is_singular(&sqd->ctx_list);
-
list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
if (current->cred != ctx->creds) {
if (old_cred)
@@ -6995,24 +6936,49 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
current->sessionid = ctx->sessionid;
#endif
- ret |= __io_sq_thread(ctx, start_jiffies, cap_entries);
+ ret = __io_sq_thread(ctx, cap_entries);
+ if (!sqt_spin && (ret > 0 || !list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list)))
+ sqt_spin = true;
io_sq_thread_drop_mm_files();
}
- if (ret & SQT_SPIN) {
+ if (sqt_spin || !time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
io_run_task_work();
cond_resched();
- } else if (ret == SQT_IDLE) {
- if (kthread_should_park())
- continue;
+ if (sqt_spin)
+ timeout = jiffies + sqd->sq_thread_idle;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (kthread_should_park())
+ continue;
+
+ needs_sched = true;
+ prepare_to_wait(&sqd->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
+ if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) &&
+ !list_empty_careful(&ctx->iopoll_list)) {
+ needs_sched = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (io_sqring_entries(ctx)) {
+ needs_sched = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (needs_sched) {
list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list)
io_ring_set_wakeup_flag(ctx);
+
schedule();
- start_jiffies = jiffies;
list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list)
io_ring_clear_wakeup_flag(ctx);
}
+
+ finish_wait(&sqd->wait, &wait);
+ timeout = jiffies + sqd->sq_thread_idle;
}
io_run_task_work();
@@ -7310,12 +7276,11 @@ static void io_sq_thread_stop(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
mutex_lock(&sqd->ctx_lock);
list_del(&ctx->sqd_list);
+ io_sqd_update_thread_idle(sqd);
mutex_unlock(&sqd->ctx_lock);
- if (sqd->thread) {
- finish_wait(&sqd->wait, &ctx->sqo_wait_entry);
+ if (sqd->thread)
io_sq_thread_unpark(sqd);
- }
io_put_sq_data(sqd);
ctx->sq_data = NULL;
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 6:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling Xiaoguang Wang
2020-11-03 6:15 ` Xiaoguang Wang [this message]
2020-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: support multiple rings to share same poll thread by specifying same cpu Xiaoguang Wang
2020-11-08 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling Xiaoguang Wang
2020-11-09 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-10 2:31 ` Xiaoguang Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201103061600.11053-2-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox