From: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Use of disowned struct filename after 3c5499fa56f5?
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 20:35:17 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 01:27:51PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 06/11/2020 13:15, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 12:49:05PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> >> On 06/11/2020 10:08, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:57:43PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> >>> That's pretty much what do_unlinkat() does btw. Thanks Pavel for looking
> >>> into this!
> >>>
> >>> Can I pick your brain some more? do_mkdirat() case is slightly
> >>> different:
> >>>
> >>> static long do_mkdirat(int dfd, const char __user *pathname, umode_t mode)
> >>> {
> >>> struct dentry *dentry;
> >>> struct path path;
> >>> int error;
> >>> unsigned int lookup_flags = LOOKUP_DIRECTORY;
> >>>
> >>> retry:
> >>> dentry = user_path_create(dfd, pathname, &path, lookup_flags);
> >>>
> >>> If we just change @pathname to struct filename, then user_path_create
> >>> can be swapped for filename_create(). But the same problem on retry
> >>> arises. Is there some more or less "idiomatic" way to solve this?
> >>
> >> I don't think there is, fs guys may have a different opinion but
> >> sometimes it's hard to get through them.
> >>
> >> I'd take a filename reference before "retry:"
> >
> > How do I do that? Just `++name.refcnt` or is there a helper function /
> > better way?
>
> I don't know, take a look around if there is one. In the end, a review and
> guys familiar with this code will hopefully suggest a better way (if any).
OK, thanks Pavel! I'll look around.
--
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-05 12:36 Use of disowned struct filename after 3c5499fa56f5? Dmitry Kadashev
2020-11-05 14:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-05 14:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-05 14:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-05 19:37 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-05 20:04 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-05 20:18 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-05 20:26 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-05 20:35 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-05 20:49 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-05 20:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-05 21:12 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-06 10:08 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-11-06 12:49 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-06 13:15 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-11-06 13:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-06 13:35 ` Dmitry Kadashev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox