public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
To: JeffleXu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/7] block: add iopoll method for non-mq device
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:33:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108173320.GA6584@lobo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Thu, Jan 07 2021 at 10:24pm -0500,
JeffleXu <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 1/8/21 5:47 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23 2020 at  6:26am -0500,
> > Jeffle Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> ->poll_fn is introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
> >> callback to struct request_queue") for supporting non-mq queues such as
> >> nvme multipath, but removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block: remove
> >> ->poll_fn").
> >>
> >> To add support of IO polling for non-mq device, this method need to be
> >> back. Since commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to
> >> struct block_device_operations") has moved all callbacks into struct
> >> block_device_operations in gendisk, we also add the new method named
> >> ->iopoll in block_device_operations.
> > 
> > Please update patch subject and header to:
> > 
> > block: add iopoll method to support bio-based IO polling
> > 
> > ->poll_fn was introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
> > callback to struct request_queue") to support bio-based queues such as
> > nvme multipath, but was later removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block:
> > remove ->poll_fn").
> > 
> > Given commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to struct
> > block_device_operations") restore the possibility of bio-based IO
> > polling support by adding an ->iopoll method to gendisk->fops.
> > Elevate bulk of blk_mq_poll() implementation to blk_poll() and reduce
> > blk_mq_poll() to blk-mq specific code that is called from blk_poll().
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  block/blk-core.c       | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  block/blk-mq.c         | 70 +++++--------------------------------
> >>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 ++
> >>  include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
> >>  4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> >> index 96e5fcd7f071..2f5c51ce32e3 100644
> >> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> >> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> >> @@ -1131,6 +1131,85 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> >>  }
> >>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio);
> >>  
> >> +static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> >> +
> >> +	/* TODO: bio-based device doesn't support hybrid poll. */
> >> +	if (!queue_is_mq(q))
> >> +		return false;
> >> +
> >> +	hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
> >> +	if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
> >> +		return true;
> >> +
> >> +	hctx->poll_considered++;
> >> +	return false;
> >> +}
> > 
> > I don't see where you ever backfill bio-based hybrid support (in
> > the following patches in this series, so it is lingering TODO).
> 
> Yes the hybrid polling is not implemented and thus bypassed for
> bio-based device currently.
> 
> > 
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
> >> + * @q:  the queue
> >> + * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time
> >> + * @spin: whether to spin for completions
> >> + *
> >> + * Description:
> >> + *    Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of
> >> + *    completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will continue
> >> + *    looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is
> >> + *    otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule).
> >> + */
> >> +int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
> >> +{
> >> +	long state;
> >> +
> >> +	if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
> >> +	    !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
> >> +		return 0;
> >> +
> >> +	if (current->plug)
> >> +		blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
> >> +
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
> >> +	 * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
> >> +	 * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
> >> +	 * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
> >> +	 * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
> >> +	 * we also should not sleep.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (spin && blk_poll_hybrid(q, cookie))
> >> +		return 1;
> >> +
> >> +	state = current->state;
> >> +	do {
> >> +		int ret;
> >> +		struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q);
> >> +
> >> +		if (disk->fops->iopoll)
> >> +			ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
> >> +		else
> >> +			ret = blk_mq_poll(q, cookie);
> 
> The original code is indeed buggy. For bio-based device, ->iopoll() may
> not be implemented while QUEUE_FLAG_POLL flag is still set, in which
> case blk_mq_poll() will be called for this bio-based device.

Yes, here is the patch I created to capture my suggestions.  Provided it
looks good to you, please fold it into patch 3 when you rebase for
posting a v2 of your patchset:

From: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:45:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] fixup patch 3

---
 block/blk-core.c       | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 block/blk-mq.c         |  6 ++----
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index e6671f6ce1a4..44f62dc0fa9f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1212,22 +1212,6 @@ int blk_bio_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_bio_poll);
 
-static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
-{
-	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
-
-	/* TODO: bio-based device doesn't support hybrid poll. */
-	if (!queue_is_mq(q))
-		return false;
-
-	hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
-	if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
-		return true;
-
-	hctx->poll_considered++;
-	return false;
-}
-
 /**
  * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
  * @q:  the queue
@@ -1243,6 +1227,8 @@ static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
 int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
 {
 	long state;
+	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = NULL;
+	struct gendisk *disk = NULL;
 
 	if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
 	    !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
@@ -1251,26 +1237,31 @@ int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
 	if (current->plug)
 		blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
 
-	/*
-	 * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
-	 * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
-	 * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
-	 * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
-	 * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
-	 * we also should not sleep.
-	 */
-	if (spin && blk_poll_hybrid(q, cookie))
-		return 1;
+	if (queue_is_mq(q)) {
+		/*
+		 * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
+		 * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
+		 * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
+		 * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
+		 * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
+		 * we also should not sleep.
+		 */
+		hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
+		if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
+			return 1;
+		hctx->poll_considered++;
+	} else
+		disk = queue_to_disk(q);
 
 	state = current->state;
 	do {
 		int ret;
-		struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q);
 
-		if (disk->fops->iopoll)
+		if (hctx)
+			ret = blk_mq_poll(q, hctx, cookie);
+		else if (disk->fops->iopoll)
 			ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
-		else
-			ret = blk_mq_poll(q, cookie);
+
 		if (ret > 0) {
 			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 			return ret;
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index fcb44604f806..90d8dead1da5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3826,12 +3826,10 @@ bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
 	return blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(q, rq);
 }
 
-int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
+int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q,
+		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
 {
 	int ret;
-	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
-
-	hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
 
 	hctx->poll_invoked++;
 	ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 2f3742207df5..b95f2ffa866f 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -607,7 +607,8 @@ static inline void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
 }
 
 blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio);
-int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie);
+int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q,
+		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie);
 bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
 		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie);
 void blk_mq_hctx_set_fq_lock_class(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
-- 
2.15.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-08 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23 11:26 [PATCH RFC 0/7] dm: add support of iopoll Jeffle Xu
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] block: move definition of blk_qc_t to types.h Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 19:04   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] block: add helper function fetching gendisk from queue Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 20:31   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] block: add iopoll method for non-mq device Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 21:47   ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-08  3:24     ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-08 17:33       ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2021-01-11  7:50         ` JeffleXu
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] block: define blk_qc_t as uintptr_t Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 21:52   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] dm: always return BLK_QC_T_NONE for bio-based device Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 21:54   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] block: track cookies of split bios " Jeffle Xu
2021-01-07 22:18   ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-08  3:08     ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-08 17:26       ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-12  5:46         ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-12 16:13           ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-14  9:16             ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-14 14:30               ` Mike Snitzer
2021-01-12  7:11         ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2020-12-23 11:26 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] dm: add support for IO polling Jeffle Xu
2021-01-08  3:12   ` [dm-devel] " JeffleXu
2021-01-07  1:14 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/7] dm: add support of iopoll JeffleXu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210108173320.GA6584@lobo \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox