public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
	Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>,
	Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>,
	Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <[email protected]>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <[email protected]>,
	Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] bio: don't copy bvec for direct IO
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:00:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111030014.GH4147870@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69fef253b37fc44dd28c43398715e27cee5e0fe0.1610170479.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 04:03:03PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> The block layer spends quite a while in blkdev_direct_IO() to copy and
> initialise bio's bvec. However, if we've already got a bvec in the input
> iterator it might be reused in some cases, i.e. when new
> ITER_BVEC_FLAG_FIXED flag is set. Simple tests show considerable
> performance boost, and it also reduces memory footprint.
> 
> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst |  9 ++++
>  block/bio.c                           | 67 ++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/bio.h                   |  5 +-
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> index c722d94f29ea..1f8cf8e10b34 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> @@ -872,3 +872,12 @@ its result is kern_unmount() or kern_unmount_array().
>  
>  zero-length bvec segments are disallowed, they must be filtered out before
>  passed on to an iterator.
> +
> +---
> +
> +**mandatory**
> +
> +For bvec based itererators bio_iov_iter_get_pages() now doesn't copy bvecs but
> +uses the one provided. Anyone issuing kiocb-I/O should ensure that the bvec and
> +page references stay until I/O has completed, i.e. until ->ki_complete() has
> +been called or returned with non -EIOCBQUEUED code.
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 9f26984af643..6f031a04b59a 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -960,21 +960,17 @@ void bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio, bool mark_dirty)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_release_pages);
>  
> -static int __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> +static int bio_iov_bvec_set(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  {
> -	const struct bio_vec *bv = iter->bvec;
> -	unsigned int len;
> -	size_t size;
> -
> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->iov_offset > bv->bv_len))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	len = min_t(size_t, bv->bv_len - iter->iov_offset, iter->count);
> -	size = bio_add_page(bio, bv->bv_page, len,
> -				bv->bv_offset + iter->iov_offset);
> -	if (unlikely(size != len))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	iov_iter_advance(iter, size);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(BVEC_POOL_IDX(bio) != 0);
> +
> +	bio->bi_vcnt = iter->nr_segs;
> +	bio->bi_max_vecs = iter->nr_segs;
> +	bio->bi_io_vec = (struct bio_vec *)iter->bvec;
> +	bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done = iter->iov_offset;
> +	bio->bi_iter.bi_size = iter->count;
> +
> +	iov_iter_advance(iter, iter->count);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1088,12 +1084,12 @@ static int __bio_iov_append_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>   * This takes either an iterator pointing to user memory, or one pointing to
>   * kernel pages (BVEC iterator). If we're adding user pages, we pin them and
>   * map them into the kernel. On IO completion, the caller should put those
> - * pages. If we're adding kernel pages, and the caller told us it's safe to
> - * do so, we just have to add the pages to the bio directly. We don't grab an
> - * extra reference to those pages (the user should already have that), and we
> - * don't put the page on IO completion. The caller needs to check if the bio is
> - * flagged BIO_NO_PAGE_REF on IO completion. If it isn't, then pages should be
> - * released.
> + * pages. For bvec based iterators bio_iov_iter_get_pages() uses the provided
> + * bvecs rather than copying them. Hence anyone issuing kiocb based IO needs
> + * to ensure the bvecs and pages stay referenced until the submitted I/O is
> + * completed by a call to ->ki_complete() or returns with an error other than
> + * -EIOCBQUEUED. The caller needs to check if the bio is flagged BIO_NO_PAGE_REF
> + * on IO completion. If it isn't, then pages should be released.
>   *
>   * The function tries, but does not guarantee, to pin as many pages as
>   * fit into the bio, or are requested in @iter, whatever is smaller. If
> @@ -1105,27 +1101,22 @@ static int __bio_iov_append_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>   */
>  int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  {
> -	const bool is_bvec = iov_iter_is_bvec(iter);
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio->bi_vcnt))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	do {
> -		if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND) {
> -			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(is_bvec))
> -				return -EINVAL;
> -			ret = __bio_iov_append_get_pages(bio, iter);
> -		} else {
> -			if (is_bvec)
> -				ret = __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages(bio, iter);
> +	if (iov_iter_is_bvec(iter)) {
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		bio_iov_bvec_set(bio, iter);
> +		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_NO_PAGE_REF);
> +		return 0;
> +	} else {
> +		do {
> +			if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND)
> +				ret = __bio_iov_append_get_pages(bio, iter);
>  			else
>  				ret = __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, iter);
> -		}
> -	} while (!ret && iov_iter_count(iter) && !bio_full(bio, 0));
> -
> -	if (is_bvec)
> -		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_NO_PAGE_REF);
> +		} while (!ret && iov_iter_count(iter) && !bio_full(bio, 0));
> +	}
>  
>  	/* don't account direct I/O as memory stall */
>  	bio_clear_flag(bio, BIO_WORKINGSET);
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index d8f9077c43ef..1d30572a8c53 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -444,10 +444,13 @@ static inline void bio_wouldblock_error(struct bio *bio)
>  
>  /*
>   * Calculate number of bvec segments that should be allocated to fit data
> - * pointed by @iter.
> + * pointed by @iter. If @iter is backed by bvec it's going to be reused
> + * instead of allocating a new one.
>   */
>  static inline int bio_iov_vecs_to_alloc(struct iov_iter *iter, int max_segs)
>  {
> +	if (iov_iter_is_bvec(iter))
> +		return 0;
>  	return iov_iter_npages(iter, max_segs);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.24.0
> 

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>

-- 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-09 16:02 [PATCH v3 0/7] no-copy bvec Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] splice: don't generate zero-len segement bvecs Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  2:48   ` Ming Lei
2021-01-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] bvec/iter: disallow zero-length segment bvecs Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  2:49   ` Ming Lei
2021-01-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] block/psi: remove PSI annotations from direct IO Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  2:52   ` Ming Lei
2021-01-09 16:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] target/file: allocate the bvec array as part of struct target_core_file_cmd Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  2:53   ` Ming Lei
2021-01-09 16:03 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] iov_iter: optimise bvec iov_iter_advance() Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  2:55   ` Ming Lei
2021-01-09 16:03 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] bio: add a helper calculating nr segments to alloc Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2021-01-09 16:03 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] bio: don't copy bvec for direct IO Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  3:00   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-01-25 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] no-copy bvec Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210111030014.GH4147870@T590 \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox