* [PATCH liburing] tests: add another timeout sequence test case
@ 2021-01-18 17:00 Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez
2021-01-19 14:04 ` Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez @ 2021-01-18 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: asml.silence, io-uring, Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez
This test case catches an issue where timeouts may not be flushed
if the number of new events is greater (not equal) to the number
of events requested in the timeout.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
---
test/timeout.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/timeout.c b/test/timeout.c
index 9c8211c..d46d93d 100644
--- a/test/timeout.c
+++ b/test/timeout.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ err:
/*
* Test numbered trigger of timeout
*/
-static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
+static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring, int nr)
{
struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
}
msec_to_ts(&ts, TIMEOUT_MSEC);
- io_uring_prep_timeout(sqe, &ts, 2, 0);
+ io_uring_prep_timeout(sqe, &ts, nr, 0);
sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
io_uring_prep_nop(sqe);
@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
goto err;
}
+ ret = cqe->res;
+
/*
* NOP commands have user_data as 1. Check that we get the
* two NOPs first, then the successfully removed timout as
@@ -167,15 +169,16 @@ static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
fprintf(stderr, "%s: timeout not last\n", __FUNCTION__);
goto err;
}
+ if (ret) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "%s: timeout triggered by passage of"
+ " time, not by events completed\n", __FUNCTION__);
+ goto err;
+ }
break;
}
- ret = cqe->res;
io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe);
- if (ret < 0) {
- fprintf(stderr, "Timeout: %s\n", strerror(-ret));
- goto err;
- } else if (ret) {
+ if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "res: %d\n", ret);
goto err;
}
@@ -1224,9 +1227,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
return ret;
}
- ret = test_single_timeout_nr(&ring);
+ ret = test_single_timeout_nr(&ring, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "test_single_timeout_nr(1) failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ ret = test_single_timeout_nr(&ring, 2);
if (ret) {
- fprintf(stderr, "test_single_timeout_nr failed\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "test_single_timeout_nr(2) failed\n");
return ret;
}
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH liburing] tests: add another timeout sequence test case
2021-01-18 17:00 [PATCH liburing] tests: add another timeout sequence test case Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez
@ 2021-01-19 14:04 ` Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez @ 2021-01-19 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: asml.silence, io-uring
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:00:29PM -0500, Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez wrote:
> This test case catches an issue where timeouts may not be flushed
> if the number of new events is greater (not equal) to the number
> of events requested in the timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> ---
> test/timeout.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/timeout.c b/test/timeout.c
> index 9c8211c..d46d93d 100644
> --- a/test/timeout.c
> +++ b/test/timeout.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ err:
> /*
> * Test numbered trigger of timeout
> */
> -static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
> +static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring, int nr)
> {
> struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
> struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
> }
>
> msec_to_ts(&ts, TIMEOUT_MSEC);
> - io_uring_prep_timeout(sqe, &ts, 2, 0);
> + io_uring_prep_timeout(sqe, &ts, nr, 0);
>
> sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
> io_uring_prep_nop(sqe);
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
> goto err;
> }
>
> + ret = cqe->res;
> +
> /*
> * NOP commands have user_data as 1. Check that we get the
> * two NOPs first, then the successfully removed timout as
> @@ -167,15 +169,16 @@ static int test_single_timeout_nr(struct io_uring *ring)
> fprintf(stderr, "%s: timeout not last\n", __FUNCTION__);
> goto err;
> }
Ahh wait actually I don't like it so much because this assumes the
timeout has to be the last one in the ring even when nr = 1. Happens
to be true but doesn't seem like something the test should require in
that case. I'll send a v2 later.
-Marcelo
> + if (ret) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: timeout triggered by passage of"
> + " time, not by events completed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> + goto err;
> + }
> break;
> }
>
> - ret = cqe->res;
> io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "Timeout: %s\n", strerror(-ret));
> - goto err;
> - } else if (ret) {
> + if (ret) {
> fprintf(stderr, "res: %d\n", ret);
> goto err;
> }
> @@ -1224,9 +1227,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = test_single_timeout_nr(&ring);
> + ret = test_single_timeout_nr(&ring, 1);
> + if (ret) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "test_single_timeout_nr(1) failed\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ret = test_single_timeout_nr(&ring, 2);
> if (ret) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "test_single_timeout_nr failed\n");
> + fprintf(stderr, "test_single_timeout_nr(2) failed\n");
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-19 23:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-18 17:00 [PATCH liburing] tests: add another timeout sequence test case Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez
2021-01-19 14:04 ` Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox