From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D609C433E0 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 23:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EAE22CF7 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 23:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726288AbhAWX3k (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 18:29:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53232 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726223AbhAWX3i (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 18:29:38 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B196DC0613D6; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 15:28:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=3yZG/MXVqlbwoylF6Mu7eqGVO8ZMyTpVlbCjsWzD+LE=; b=dFtFpDpo9JGJHPyarlu931wkH2 fF2+P6HNqUkd/fQWYg0ZRCWZc6D4UEcw2FBIQXfmqmdHw5lsuNQlqsgyBxAyWVo9GiinypEFBu6se +9X7xkfHZGndCvRfQAc+01VlYtWoGPB1mtxh/xn26CvSD98mDQCNItjoLZjMN7b7W3kqETQDyd7re xSUwcNzxAahiQrMDg9LVj/FANADeyNV7nG+sjqA2LN1y76xnzfVeFOBJCiyTxo3TGTSZ4DwCECHHJ yUHCOXmEskWRRDgCRpUE90fiFnVc98gMXOtTYfF17QT4NH6yDDjnoCchSIAsToaTj9kmAQwHoIR3a jX+g4Zgg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l3SJu-002QFn-CG; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 23:28:03 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 23:27:54 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Lennert Buytenhek Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_GETDENTS64 Message-ID: <20210123232754.GA308988@casper.infradead.org> References: <20210123114152.GA120281@wantstofly.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210123114152.GA120281@wantstofly.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 01:41:52PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > IORING_OP_GETDENTS64 behaves like getdents64(2) and takes the same Could we drop the '64'? We don't, for example, have IOURING_OP_FADVISE64 even though that's the name of the syscall.