From: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: Optimize and improve the hot path
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:36:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
The improvements in this patch are as follows:
- Change several memory barriers into load acquire / store release
instructions since the latter are faster.
- Ensure that the completion has been reaped from use space by
using smp_load_acquire() in __io_cqring_events(). Preceding
__io_cqring_events() with smp_rmb() is not sufficient because the CPU
may reorder READ_ONCE() in __io_cqring_events() with later memory
accesses.
- Fix a race between the WRITE_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed, 1) in
io_complete_rw_iopoll() and req->iopoll_completed = 0 in
io_sqring_entries() by reading req->iopoll_completed before comparing
req->result with -EAGAIN.
This patch has been tested by running the liburing test suite.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index c07913ec0cca..2fff7250f0b1 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1727,9 +1727,9 @@ static inline bool io_should_trigger_evfd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
return io_wq_current_is_worker();
}
-static inline unsigned __io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+static inline unsigned io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
- return ctx->cached_cq_tail - READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.head);
+ return ctx->cached_cq_tail - smp_load_acquire(&ctx->rings->cq.head);
}
static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static bool __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force,
bool all_flushed;
LIST_HEAD(list);
- if (!force && __io_cqring_events(ctx) == rings->cq_ring_entries)
+ if (!force && io_cqring_events(ctx) == rings->cq_ring_entries)
return false;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
@@ -2385,13 +2385,6 @@ static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
io_free_req(req);
}
-static unsigned io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-{
- /* See comment at the top of this file */
- smp_rmb();
- return __io_cqring_events(ctx);
-}
-
static inline unsigned int io_sqring_entries(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings;
@@ -2457,15 +2450,13 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
struct io_kiocb *req;
LIST_HEAD(again);
- /* order with ->result store in io_complete_rw_iopoll() */
- smp_rmb();
-
io_init_req_batch(&rb);
while (!list_empty(done)) {
int cflags = 0;
req = list_first_entry(done, struct io_kiocb, inflight_entry);
- if (READ_ONCE(req->result) == -EAGAIN) {
+ if (smp_load_acquire(&req->iopoll_completed) &&
+ req->result == -EAGAIN) {
req->result = 0;
req->iopoll_completed = 0;
list_move_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &again);
@@ -2514,7 +2505,7 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
* If we find a request that requires polling, break out
* and complete those lists first, if we have entries there.
*/
- if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed)) {
+ if (smp_load_acquire(&req->iopoll_completed)) {
list_move_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &done);
continue;
}
@@ -2526,7 +2517,7 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
break;
/* iopoll may have completed current req */
- if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed))
+ if (smp_load_acquire(&req->iopoll_completed))
list_move_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &done);
if (ret && spin)
@@ -2767,10 +2758,9 @@ static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res, long res2)
if (res != -EAGAIN && res != req->result)
req_set_fail_links(req);
- WRITE_ONCE(req->result, res);
- /* order with io_poll_complete() checking ->result */
- smp_wmb();
- WRITE_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed, 1);
+ req->result = res;
+ /* order with io_poll_complete() checking ->iopoll_completed */
+ smp_store_release(&req->iopoll_completed, 1);
}
/*
@@ -2803,7 +2793,7 @@ static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req, bool in_async)
* For fast devices, IO may have already completed. If it has, add
* it to the front so we find it first.
*/
- if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed))
+ if (smp_load_acquire(&req->iopoll_completed))
list_add(&req->inflight_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
else
list_add_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 18:36 Bart Van Assche [this message]
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2021-01-29 19:10 ` [PATCH] io_uring: Optimize and improve the hot path Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox