From: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: don't issue reqs in iopoll mode when ctx is dying
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:00:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Abaci Robot reported following panic:
------------[ cut here ]------------
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 195 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x137/0x140
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 195 Comm: kworker/u4:2 Not tainted 5.11.0-rc3+ #70
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.1-0-g0551a4be2c-prebuilt.qemu-project.or4
Workqueue: events_unbound io_ring_exit_work
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x137/0x140
Code: 05 ad 63 49 08 01 e8 45 0f 6f 00 0f 0b e9 16 ff ff ff e8 4c ba ae ff 48 c7 c7 28 2e 7c 82 c6 05 90 63 40
RSP: 0018:ffffc900002e3cc8 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff888102918000 RSI: ffffffff81150a34 RDI: ffff88813bd28570
RBP: ffff8881075cd348 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000080000 R12: ffff8881075cd308
R13: ffff8881075cd348 R14: ffff888122d33ab8 R15: ffff888104780300
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000108 CR3: 0000000107636005 CR4: 0000000000060ee0
Call Trace:
io_dismantle_req+0x3f3/0x5b0
__io_free_req+0x2c/0x270
io_put_req+0x4c/0x70
io_wq_cancel_cb+0x171/0x470
? io_match_task.part.0+0x80/0x80
__io_uring_cancel_task_requests+0xa0/0x190
io_ring_exit_work+0x32/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x2f3/0x720
worker_thread+0x5a/0x4b0
? process_one_work+0x720/0x720
kthread+0x138/0x180
? kthread_park+0xd0/0xd0
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Later system will panic for some memory corruption.
The io_identity's count is underflowed. It's because in io_put_identity,
first argument tctx comes from req->task->io_uring, the second argument
comes from the task context that calls io_req_init_async, so the compare
in io_put_identity maybe meaningless. See below case:
task context A issue one polled req, then req->task = A.
task context B do iopoll, above req returns with EAGAIN error.
task context B re-issue req, call io_queue_async_work for req.
req->task->io_uring will set to task context B's identity, or cow new one.
then for above case, in io_put_identity(), the compare is meaningless.
IIUC, req->task should indicates the initial task context that issues req,
then if it gets EAGAIN error, we'll call io_prep_async_work() in req->task
context, but iopoll reqs seems special, they maybe issued successfully and
got re-issued in other task context because of EAGAIN error.
Currently for this panic, we can disable issuing reqs that are returned
with EAGAIN error in iopoll mode when ctx is dying, but we may need to
re-consider the io identity codes more.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 9db05171a774..e3b90426d72b 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2467,7 +2467,12 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
int cflags = 0;
req = list_first_entry(done, struct io_kiocb, inflight_entry);
- if (READ_ONCE(req->result) == -EAGAIN) {
+ /*
+ * If ctx is dying, don't need to issue reqs that are returned
+ * with EAGAIN error, since there maybe no users to reap them.
+ */
+ if ((READ_ONCE(req->result) == -EAGAIN) &&
+ !percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs)) {
req->result = 0;
req->iopoll_completed = 0;
list_move_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &again);
--
2.17.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-06 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-06 15:00 Xiaoguang Wang [this message]
2021-02-07 17:30 ` [PATCH] io_uring: don't issue reqs in iopoll mode when ctx is dying Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-08 2:50 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-02-08 13:35 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-22 13:23 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-24 2:30 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-02-24 2:35 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-24 2:45 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-02-24 2:51 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-24 9:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-24 9:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-24 10:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-24 9:38 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-24 12:42 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-25 10:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-24 3:23 ` Xiaoguang Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210206150006.1945-1-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox