From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 03/18] io_uring: disable io-wq attaching
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:09:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Moving towards making the io_wq per ring per task, so we can't really
share it between rings. Which is fine, since we've now dropped some
of that fat from it.
Retain compatibility with how attaching works, so that any attempt to
attach to an fd that doesn't exist, or isn't an io_uring fd, will fail
like it did before.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index bbd1ec7aa9e9..0eeb2a1596c2 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8130,12 +8130,9 @@ static struct io_wq_work *io_free_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
return req ? &req->work : NULL;
}
-static int io_init_wq_offload(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
- struct io_uring_params *p)
+static int io_init_wq_offload(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
struct io_wq_data data;
- struct fd f;
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx_attach;
unsigned int concurrency;
int ret = 0;
@@ -8143,37 +8140,15 @@ static int io_init_wq_offload(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
data.free_work = io_free_work;
data.do_work = io_wq_submit_work;
- if (!(p->flags & IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ)) {
- /* Do QD, or 4 * CPUS, whatever is smallest */
- concurrency = min(ctx->sq_entries, 4 * num_online_cpus());
-
- ctx->io_wq = io_wq_create(concurrency, &data);
- if (IS_ERR(ctx->io_wq)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->io_wq);
- ctx->io_wq = NULL;
- }
- return ret;
- }
-
- f = fdget(p->wq_fd);
- if (!f.file)
- return -EBADF;
-
- if (f.file->f_op != &io_uring_fops) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_fput;
- }
+ /* Do QD, or 4 * CPUS, whatever is smallest */
+ concurrency = min(ctx->sq_entries, 4 * num_online_cpus());
- ctx_attach = f.file->private_data;
- /* @io_wq is protected by holding the fd */
- if (!io_wq_get(ctx_attach->io_wq, &data)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_fput;
+ ctx->io_wq = io_wq_create(concurrency, &data);
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx->io_wq)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->io_wq);
+ ctx->io_wq = NULL;
}
- ctx->io_wq = ctx_attach->io_wq;
-out_fput:
- fdput(f);
return ret;
}
@@ -8225,6 +8200,20 @@ static int io_sq_offload_create(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
{
int ret;
+ /* Retain compatibility with failing for an invalid attach attempt */
+ if ((ctx->flags & (IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ | IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)) ==
+ IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ) {
+ struct fd f;
+
+ f = fdget(p->wq_fd);
+ if (!f.file)
+ return -ENXIO;
+ if (f.file->f_op != &io_uring_fops) {
+ fdput(f);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ fdput(f);
+ }
if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) {
struct io_sq_data *sqd;
@@ -8282,7 +8271,7 @@ static int io_sq_offload_create(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
}
done:
- ret = io_init_wq_offload(ctx, p);
+ ret = io_init_wq_offload(ctx);
if (ret)
goto err;
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-19 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-19 17:09 [PATCHSET RFC 0/18] Remove kthread usage from io_uring Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/18] io_uring: remove the need for relying on an io-wq fallback worker Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 20:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-02-19 20:37 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-22 13:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/18] io-wq: don't create any IO workers upfront Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/18] io-wq: get rid of wq->use_refs Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/18] io_uring: tie async worker side to the task context Jens Axboe
2021-02-20 8:11 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-20 14:38 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-21 9:16 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/18] io-wq: don't pass 'wqe' needlessly around Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/18] arch: setup PF_IO_WORKER threads like PF_KTHREAD Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 22:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-02-19 23:26 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/18] kernel: treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for ptrace/signals Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/18] io-wq: fork worker threads from original task Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 12:23 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 13:05 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 13:19 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 16:13 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 17:09 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-04 17:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-04 19:19 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-04 19:54 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 20:00 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 20:23 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-04 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-04 20:54 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-05 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-03-05 19:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/18] io-wq: worker idling always returns false Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 11/18] io_uring: remove any grabbing of context Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 12/18] io_uring: remove io_identity Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/18] io-wq: only remove worker from free_list, if it was there Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/18] io-wq: make io_wq_fork_thread() available to other users Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/18] io_uring: move SQPOLL thread io-wq forked worker Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/18] Revert "proc: don't allow async path resolution of /proc/thread-self components" Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/18] Revert "proc: don't allow async path resolution of /proc/self components" Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/18] net: remove cmsg restriction from io_uring based send/recvmsg calls Jens Axboe
2021-02-19 23:44 ` [PATCHSET RFC 0/18] Remove kthread usage from io_uring Stefan Metzmacher
2021-02-19 23:51 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-21 5:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-21 21:22 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox