[PATCH 01/27] io-wq: fix race in freeing 'wq' and worker access

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

Ran into a use-after-free on the main io-wq struct, wq. It has a worker
ref and completion event, but the manager itself isn't holding a
reference. This can lead to a race where the manager thinks there are
no workers and exits, but a worker is being added. That leads to the
following trace:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in io_wqe_worker+0x4c0/0x5e0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888108baa8a0 by task iou-wrk-3080422/3080425

CPU: 5 PID: 3080425 Comm: iou-wrk-3080422 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1+ #110
Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7C60/TRX40 PRO 10G (MS-7C60), BIOS 1.60 05/13/2020
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x90/0xbe
 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x67/0x28d
 ? io_wqe_worker+0x4c0/0x5e0
 kasan_report.cold+0x7b/0xd4
 ? io_wqe_worker+0x4c0/0x5e0
 __asan_load8+0x6d/0xa0
 io_wqe_worker+0x4c0/0x5e0
 ? io_worker_handle_work+0xc00/0xc00
 ? recalc_sigpending+0xe5/0x120
 ? io_worker_handle_work+0xc00/0xc00
 ? io_worker_handle_work+0xc00/0xc00
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

Allocated by task 3080422:
 kasan_save_stack+0x23/0x60
 __kasan_kmalloc+0x80/0xa0
 kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0xa0/0x480
 io_wq_create+0x3b5/0x600
 io_uring_alloc_task_context+0x13c/0x380
 io_uring_add_task_file+0x109/0x140
 __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x45f/0x660
 do_syscall_64+0x32/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Freed by task 3080422:
 kasan_save_stack+0x23/0x60
 kasan_set_track+0x20/0x40
 kasan_set_free_info+0x24/0x40
 __kasan_slab_free+0xe8/0x120
 kfree+0xa8/0x400
 io_wq_put+0x14a/0x220
 io_wq_put_and_exit+0x9a/0xc0
 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x101/0x140
 __io_uring_files_cancel+0x36e/0x3c0
 do_exit+0x169/0x1340
 __x64_sys_exit+0x34/0x40
 do_syscall_64+0x32/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Have the manager itself hold a reference, and now both drop points drop
and complete if we hit zero, and the manager can unconditionally do a
wait_for_completion() instead of having a race between reading the ref
count and waiting if it was non-zero.

Fixes: fb3a1f6c745c ("io-wq: have manager wait for all workers to exit")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 fs/io-wq.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 28868eb4cd09..1bfdb86336e4 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -722,9 +722,9 @@ static int io_wq_manager(void *data)
 		io_wq_for_each_worker(wq->wqes[node], io_wq_worker_wake, NULL);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	/* we might not ever have created any workers */
-	if (atomic_read(&wq->worker_refs))
-		wait_for_completion(&wq->worker_done);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&wq->worker_refs))
+		complete(&wq->worker_done);
+	wait_for_completion(&wq->worker_done);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&wq->hash->wait.lock);
 	for_each_node(node)
@@ -774,7 +774,8 @@ static int io_wq_fork_manager(struct io_wq *wq)
 	if (wq->manager)
 		return 0;
 
-	reinit_completion(&wq->worker_done);
+	init_completion(&wq->worker_done);
+	atomic_set(&wq->worker_refs, 1);
 	tsk = create_io_thread(io_wq_manager, wq, NUMA_NO_NODE);
 	if (!IS_ERR(tsk)) {
 		wq->manager = get_task_struct(tsk);
@@ -782,6 +783,9 @@ static int io_wq_fork_manager(struct io_wq *wq)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&wq->worker_refs))
+		complete(&wq->worker_done);
+
 	return PTR_ERR(tsk);
 }
 
@@ -1018,13 +1022,9 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
 	init_completion(&wq->exited);
 	refcount_set(&wq->refs, 1);
 
-	init_completion(&wq->worker_done);
-	atomic_set(&wq->worker_refs, 0);
-
 	ret = io_wq_fork_manager(wq);
 	if (!ret)
 		return wq;
-
 err:
 	io_wq_put_hash(data->hash);
 	cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(io_wq_online, &wq->cpuhp_node);
-- 
2.30.2