From: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>,
LKML <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>,
Kernel Hardening <[email protected]>,
Linux Containers <[email protected]>,
Linux-MM <[email protected]>, Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>,
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <[email protected]>,
Jann Horn <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/8] Use atomic_t for ucounts reference counting
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:49:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202103161146.E118DE5@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjYOCgM+mKzwTZwkDDg12DdYjFFkmoFKYLim7NFmR9HBg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 03:19:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> It just saturates, and doesn't have the "don't do this" case, which
> the ucounts case *DOES* have.
Right -- I saw that when digging through the thread. I'm honestly
curious, though, why did the 0-day bot find a boot crash? (I can't
imagine ucounts wrapped in 0.4 seconds.) So it looked like an
increment-from-zero case, which seems like it would be a bug?
> I know you are attached to refcounts, but really: they are not only
> more expensive, THEY LITERALLY DO THE WRONG THING.
Heh, right -- I'm not arguing that refcount_t MUST be used, I just didn't
see the code path that made them unsuitable: hitting INT_MAX - 128 seems
very hard to do. Anyway, I'll go study it more to try to understand what
I'm missing.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-10 12:01 [PATCH v8 0/8] Count rlimits in each user namespace Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] Increase size of ucounts to atomic_long_t Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] Add a reference to ucounts for each cred Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] Use atomic_t for ucounts reference counting Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 21:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-15 22:02 ` Kees Cook
2021-03-15 22:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-16 18:49 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-03-16 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-16 19:32 ` Kees Cook
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] Reimplement RLIMIT_NPROC on top of ucounts Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] Reimplement RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE " Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] Reimplement RLIMIT_SIGPENDING " Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] Reimplement RLIMIT_MEMLOCK " Alexey Gladkov
2021-03-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] kselftests: Add test to check for rlimit changes in different user namespaces Alexey Gladkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202103161146.E118DE5@keescook \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox