From: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] namei: prepare do_unlinkat for refactoring
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:35:49 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
This is just a preparation for the move of the main unlinkat logic to a
separate function to make the logic easier to follow. This change
contains the flow changes so that the actual change to move the main
logic to a separate function does no change the flow at all.
Just like the similar patch for rmdir a few commits before, there are
two changes here:
1. Previously on filename_parentat() error the function used to exit
immediately, and now it will check the return code to see if ESTALE
retry is appropriate. The filename_parentat() does its own retries on
ESTALE, but this extra check should be completely fine.
2. The retry_estale() check is wrapped in unlikely(). Some other places
already have that and overall it seems to make sense.
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/CAHk-=wh=cpt_tQCirzFZRPawRpbuFTZ2MxNpXiyUF+eBXF=+sw@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/CAHk-=wjFd0qn6asio=zg7zUTRmSty_TpAEhnwym1Qb=wFgCKzA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
---
fs/namei.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index fbae4e9fcf53..6253486718d5 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -4148,12 +4148,12 @@ int do_unlinkat(int dfd, struct filename *name)
mnt_drop_write(path.mnt);
exit2:
path_put(&path);
- if (retry_estale(error, lookup_flags)) {
+exit1:
+ if (unlikely(retry_estale(error, lookup_flags))) {
lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_REVAL;
inode = NULL;
goto retry;
}
-exit1:
putname(name);
return error;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-15 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-15 10:35 [PATCH 00/14] namei: clean up retry logic in various do_* functions Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 01/14] namei: prepare do_rmdir for refactoring Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 19:49 ` Al Viro
2021-07-20 6:52 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 02/14] namei: clean up do_rmdir retry logic Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 20:02 ` Al Viro
2021-07-15 10:35 ` Dmitry Kadashev [this message]
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 04/14] namei: clean up do_unlinkat " Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 05/14] namei: prepare do_mkdirat for refactoring Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 20:17 ` Al Viro
2021-07-20 6:59 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-20 13:55 ` Al Viro
2021-07-21 10:02 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 06/14] namei: clean up do_mkdirat retry logic Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 07/14] namei: prepare do_mknodat for refactoring Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 08/14] namei: clean up do_mknodat retry logic Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 09/14] namei: prepare do_symlinkat for refactoring Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 10/14] namei: clean up do_symlinkat retry logic Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 11/14] namei: prepare do_linkat for refactoring Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 12/14] namei: clean up do_linkat retry logic Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 13/14] namei: prepare do_renameat2 for refactoring Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:36 ` [PATCH 14/14] namei: clean up do_renameat2 retry logic Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-15 10:39 ` [PATCH 00/14] namei: clean up retry logic in various do_* functions Dmitry Kadashev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox