public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3] io_uring: fix poll requests leaking second poll entries
@ 2021-07-28  3:03 Hao Xu
  2021-07-28 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hao Xu @ 2021-07-28  3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: io-uring, Pavel Begunkov, Joseph Qi

For pure poll requests, it doesn't remove the second poll wait entry
when it's done, neither after vfs_poll() or in the poll completion
handler. We should remove the second poll wait entry.
And we use io_poll_remove_double() rather than io_poll_remove_waitqs()
since the latter has some redundant logic.

Fixes: 88e41cf928a6 ("io_uring: add multishot mode for IORING_OP_POLL_ADD")
Cc: [email protected] # 5.13+
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---

v1-->v2
  delete redundant io_poll_remove_double()

v2-->v3
  update commit message to make it clearer

 fs/io_uring.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 83f67d33bf67..bf548af0426c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4939,7 +4939,6 @@ static bool io_poll_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, __poll_t mask)
 	if (req->poll.events & EPOLLONESHOT)
 		flags = 0;
 	if (!io_cqring_fill_event(ctx, req->user_data, error, flags)) {
-		io_poll_remove_waitqs(req);
 		req->poll.done = true;
 		flags = 0;
 	}
@@ -4962,6 +4961,7 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req)
 
 		done = io_poll_complete(req, req->result);
 		if (done) {
+			io_poll_remove_double(req);
 			hash_del(&req->hash_node);
 		} else {
 			req->result = 0;
@@ -5149,7 +5149,7 @@ static __poll_t __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
 		ipt->error = -EINVAL;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	if (ipt->error)
+	if (ipt->error || (mask && (poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT)))
 		io_poll_remove_double(req);
 	if (likely(poll->head)) {
 		spin_lock(&poll->head->lock);
@@ -5221,7 +5221,6 @@ static int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	ret = __io_arm_poll_handler(req, &apoll->poll, &ipt, mask,
 					io_async_wake);
 	if (ret || ipt.error) {
-		io_poll_remove_double(req);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
 		if (ret)
 			return IO_APOLL_READY;
-- 
2.24.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] io_uring: fix poll requests leaking second poll entries
  2021-07-28  3:03 [PATCH v3] io_uring: fix poll requests leaking second poll entries Hao Xu
@ 2021-07-28 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2021-07-28 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hao Xu; +Cc: io-uring, Pavel Begunkov, Joseph Qi

On 7/27/21 9:03 PM, Hao Xu wrote:
> For pure poll requests, it doesn't remove the second poll wait entry
> when it's done, neither after vfs_poll() or in the poll completion
> handler. We should remove the second poll wait entry.
> And we use io_poll_remove_double() rather than io_poll_remove_waitqs()
> since the latter has some redundant logic.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-28 14:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-28  3:03 [PATCH v3] io_uring: fix poll requests leaking second poll entries Hao Xu
2021-07-28 14:33 ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox