From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: fix potential req refcount underflow
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:12:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
For multishot mode, there may be cases like:
iowq original context
io_poll_add
_arm_poll()
mask = vfs_poll() is not 0
if mask
(2) io_poll_complete()
compl_unlock
(interruption happens
tw queued to original
context)
io_poll_task_func()
compl_lock
(3) done = io_poll_complete() is true
compl_unlock
put req ref
(1) if (poll->flags & EPOLLONESHOT)
put req ref
EPOLLONESHOT flag in (1) may be from (2) or (3), so there are multiple
combinations that can cause ref underfow.
Let's address it by:
- check the return value in (2) as done
- change (1) to if (done)
in this way, we only do ref put in (1) if 'oneshot flag' is from
(2)
- do poll.done check in io_poll_task_func(), so that we won't put ref
for the second time.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b7c9fcce2de2..b008edccad46 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5370,6 +5370,10 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
} else {
bool done;
+ if (req->poll.done) {
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+ return;
+ }
done = __io_poll_complete(req, req->result);
if (done) {
io_poll_remove_double(req);
@@ -5833,6 +5837,7 @@ static int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_poll_table ipt;
__poll_t mask;
+ bool done;
ipt.pt._qproc = io_poll_queue_proc;
@@ -5841,13 +5846,13 @@ static int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (mask) { /* no async, we'd stolen it */
ipt.error = 0;
- io_poll_complete(req, mask);
+ done = io_poll_complete(req, mask);
}
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (mask) {
io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
- if (poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT)
+ if (done)
io_put_req(req);
}
return ipt.error;
--
2.24.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-22 10:12 [PATCH 0/3] poll fixes Hao Xu
2021-09-22 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: fix race between poll completion and cancel_hash insertion Hao Xu
2021-09-22 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: fix lacking of EPOLLONESHOT Hao Xu
2021-09-22 10:12 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-09-22 15:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] poll fixes Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox