From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: implement async hybrid mode for pollable requests
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:29:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
The current logic of requests with IOSQE_ASYNC is first queueing it to
io-worker, then execute it in a synchronous way. For unbound works like
pollable requests(e.g. read/write a socketfd), the io-worker may stuck
there waiting for events for a long time. And thus other works wait in
the list for a long time too.
Let's introduce a new way for unbound works (currently pollable
requests), with this a request will first be queued to io-worker, then
executed in a nonblock try rather than a synchronous way. Failure of
that leads it to arm poll stuff and then the worker can begin to handle
other works.
The detail process of this kind of requests is:
step1: original context:
queue it to io-worker
step2: io-worker context:
nonblock try(the old logic is a synchronous try here)
|
|--fail--> arm poll
|
|--(fail/ready)-->synchronous issue
|
|--(succeed)-->worker finish it's job, tw
take over the req
This works much better than the old IOSQE_ASYNC logic in cases where
unbound max_worker is relatively small. In this case, number of
io-worker eazily increments to max_worker, new worker cannot be created
and running workers stuck there handling old works in IOSQE_ASYNC mode.
In my 64-core machine, set unbound max_worker to 20, run echo-server,
turns out:
(arguments: register_file, connetion number is 1000, message size is 12
Byte)
original IOSQE_ASYNC: 76664.151 tps
after this patch: 166934.985 tps
Suggested-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 727cad6c36fc..a3247a5dafc9 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -3497,7 +3497,8 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (ret == -EAGAIN || (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE)) {
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_REISSUE;
/* IOPOLL retry should happen for io-wq threads */
- if (in_worker && !(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
+ if (in_worker && !force_nonblock &&
+ !(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
goto done;
/* no retry on NONBLOCK nor RWF_NOWAIT */
if (req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT)
@@ -6749,8 +6750,18 @@ static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
ret = -ECANCELED;
if (!ret) {
+ bool needs_poll = false;
+ unsigned int issue_flags = IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED;
+
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC) {
+ needs_poll = req->file && file_can_poll(req->file);
+ if (needs_poll)
+ issue_flags |= IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
+ }
+
do {
- ret = io_issue_sqe(req, IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED);
+issue_sqe:
+ ret = io_issue_sqe(req, issue_flags);
/*
* We can get EAGAIN for polled IO even though we're
* forcing a sync submission from here, since we can't
@@ -6758,6 +6769,30 @@ static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
*/
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
+ if (needs_poll) {
+ bool armed = false;
+
+ ret = 0;
+ needs_poll = false;
+ issue_flags &= ~IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
+
+ switch (io_arm_poll_handler(req)) {
+ case IO_APOLL_READY:
+ goto issue_sqe;
+ case IO_APOLL_ABORTED:
+ /*
+ * somehow we failed to arm the poll infra,
+ * fallback it to a normal async worker try.
+ */
+ break;
+ case IO_APOLL_OK:
+ armed = true;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (armed)
+ break;
+ }
cond_resched();
} while (1);
}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index c45b5e9a9387..3e49a7dbe636 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ enum {
IOSQE_IO_HARDLINK_BIT,
IOSQE_ASYNC_BIT,
IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT_BIT,
+ IOSQE_ASYNC_HYBRID_BIT,
};
/*
@@ -87,7 +88,8 @@ enum {
#define IOSQE_ASYNC (1U << IOSQE_ASYNC_BIT)
/* select buffer from sqe->buf_group */
#define IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT (1U << IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT_BIT)
-
+/* first force async then arm poll */
+#define IOSQE_ASYNC_HYBRID (1U << IOSQE_ASYNC_HYBRID_BIT)
/*
* io_uring_setup() flags
*/
--
2.24.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] async hybrid for pollable requests Hao Xu
2021-10-18 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: split logic of force_nonblock Hao Xu
2021-10-18 12:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-18 12:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-18 13:00 ` Hao Xu
2021-10-18 11:29 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-10-18 11:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: implement async hybrid mode for pollable requests Hao Xu
2021-10-18 12:10 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-18 12:20 ` Hao Xu
2021-10-18 12:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] async hybrid " Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-18 12:35 ` Hao Xu
2021-10-18 13:17 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox