public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vito Caputo <[email protected]>
To: Drew DeVault <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Is IORING_REGISTER_BUFFERS useful given the current default RLIMIT_MLOCK?
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:42:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CF8JHZUUYC1O.3DU8635RE8FSX@taiga>

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:58:33PM +0200, Drew DeVault wrote:
> The current default for RLIMIT_MLOCK is set to 64 KiB. This is not much!
> This limit was set to this value in 2008 at the request of GnuPG.
> 
> I understand that the main audience of io_uring is high-performance
> servers and such, where configuring the rlimits appropriately is not a
> particularly burdensome ask. However, this dramatically limits the
> utility of IORING_REGISTER_BUFFERS in the end-user software use-case,
> almost such that it's entirely pointless *without* raising the mlock
> rlimit.
> 
> I wonder if we can/should make a case for raising the default rlimit to
> something more useful for $CURRENTYEAR?

If not for the gpg precedent cited, I'd say it's obviously
distribution-specific defaults choice territory when it's as simple as
what's preset in /etc/security/limits.conf.

Systemd has also been getting its hands a bit dirty in the area of
bumping resource limits, which I'm not sure how I feel about.  But it
does illustrate how downstream is perfectly capable of managing these
limits on behalf of users.

Regards,
Vito Caputo

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-25 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25 13:58 Is IORING_REGISTER_BUFFERS useful given the current default RLIMIT_MLOCK? Drew DeVault
2021-10-25 15:42 ` Vito Caputo [this message]
2021-10-26  7:12   ` Drew DeVault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211025154247.fnw6ec75fmx5tkqy@shells.gnugeneration.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox