From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] io-wq: reduce acct->lock crossing functions lock/unlock
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:46:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
reduce acct->lock lock and unlock in different functions to make the
code clearer.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 1869cf6c39f3..26ccc04797b7 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -237,10 +237,14 @@ static void io_worker_exit(struct io_worker *worker)
static inline bool io_acct_run_queue(struct io_wqe_acct *acct)
{
+ bool ret = false;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
if (!wq_list_empty(&acct->work_list) &&
!test_bit(IO_ACCT_STALLED_BIT, &acct->flags))
- return true;
- return false;
+ ret = true;
+ raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
+ return ret;
}
/*
@@ -385,13 +389,9 @@ static void io_wqe_dec_running(struct io_worker *worker)
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&acct->nr_running))
return;
- raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
- if (!io_acct_run_queue(acct)) {
- raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
+ if (!io_acct_run_queue(acct))
return;
- }
- raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
io_queue_worker_create(worker, acct, create_worker_cb);
@@ -540,6 +540,7 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
* can't make progress, any work completion or insertion will
* clear the stalled flag.
*/
+ raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
work = io_get_next_work(acct, worker);
raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
if (work) {
@@ -579,15 +580,10 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
clear_bit(IO_ACCT_STALLED_BIT, &acct->flags);
if (wq_has_sleeper(&wq->hash->wait))
wake_up(&wq->hash->wait);
- raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
- /* skip unnecessary unlock-lock wqe->lock */
if (!work)
goto get_next;
- raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
}
} while (work);
-
- raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
} while (1);
}
@@ -610,12 +606,9 @@ static int io_wqe_worker(void *data)
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
loop:
- raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
if (io_acct_run_queue(acct)) {
io_worker_handle_work(worker);
goto loop;
- } else {
- raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
}
raw_spin_lock(&wqe->lock);
/* timed out, exit unless we're the last worker */
@@ -641,10 +634,8 @@ static int io_wqe_worker(void *data)
last_timeout = !ret;
}
- if (test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &wq->state)) {
- raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
+ if (test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &wq->state))
io_worker_handle_work(worker);
- }
io_worker_exit(worker);
return 0;
--
2.24.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 4:46 [RFC 0/9] fixed worker: a new way to handle io works Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] io-wq: decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] io-wq: update check condition for lock Hao Xu
2021-11-25 14:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-11-30 3:32 ` Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] io-wq: use IO_WQ_ACCT_NR rather than hardcoded number Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] io-wq: move hash wait entry to io_wqe_acct Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] io-wq: add infra data structure for fixed workers Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] io-wq: implement fixed worker logic Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] io-wq: batch the handling of fixed worker private works Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] io-wq: small optimization for __io_worker_busy() Hao Xu
2021-11-25 15:09 ` [RFC 0/9] fixed worker: a new way to handle io works Pavel Begunkov
2021-11-30 3:48 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox