From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] io-wq: update check condition for lock
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:46:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Update sparse check since we changed the lock.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 26ccc04797b7..443c34d9b326 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -378,7 +378,6 @@ static bool io_queue_worker_create(struct io_worker *worker,
}
static void io_wqe_dec_running(struct io_worker *worker)
- __must_hold(wqe->lock)
{
struct io_wqe_acct *acct = io_wqe_get_acct(worker);
struct io_wqe *wqe = worker->wqe;
@@ -449,7 +448,7 @@ static void io_wait_on_hash(struct io_wqe *wqe, unsigned int hash)
static struct io_wq_work *io_get_next_work(struct io_wqe_acct *acct,
struct io_worker *worker)
- __must_hold(wqe->lock)
+ __must_hold(acct->lock)
{
struct io_wq_work_node *node, *prev;
struct io_wq_work *work, *tail;
@@ -523,7 +522,6 @@ static void io_assign_current_work(struct io_worker *worker,
static void io_wqe_enqueue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wq_work *work);
static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
- __releases(wqe->lock)
{
struct io_wqe_acct *acct = io_wqe_get_acct(worker);
struct io_wqe *wqe = worker->wqe;
@@ -986,7 +984,6 @@ static inline void io_wqe_remove_pending(struct io_wqe *wqe,
static bool io_acct_cancel_pending_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
struct io_wqe_acct *acct,
struct io_cb_cancel_data *match)
- __releases(wqe->lock)
{
struct io_wq_work_node *node, *prev;
struct io_wq_work *work;
--
2.24.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 4:46 [RFC 0/9] fixed worker: a new way to handle io works Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] io-wq: decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] io-wq: reduce acct->lock crossing functions lock/unlock Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-11-25 14:47 ` [PATCH 3/9] io-wq: update check condition for lock Pavel Begunkov
2021-11-30 3:32 ` Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] io-wq: use IO_WQ_ACCT_NR rather than hardcoded number Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] io-wq: move hash wait entry to io_wqe_acct Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] io-wq: add infra data structure for fixed workers Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] io-wq: implement fixed worker logic Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] io-wq: batch the handling of fixed worker private works Hao Xu
2021-11-24 4:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] io-wq: small optimization for __io_worker_busy() Hao Xu
2021-11-25 15:09 ` [RFC 0/9] fixed worker: a new way to handle io works Pavel Begunkov
2021-11-30 3:48 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox