From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v7] io_uring: batch completion in prior_task_list
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 23:24:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
In previous patches, we have already gathered some tw with
io_req_task_complete() as callback in prior_task_list, let's complete
them in batch while we cannot grab uring lock. In this way, we batch
the req_complete_post path.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
v6->v7
- use function pointer to reduce the if check everytime running a task
work in handle_prior_tw_list()
fs/io_uring.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index e9c67f19d585..2c0ff1fc6974 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2223,6 +2223,53 @@ static inline unsigned int io_put_rw_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req)
return io_put_kbuf(req, req->kbuf);
}
+static inline void ctx_commit_and_unlock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ io_commit_cqring(ctx);
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+ io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+}
+
+static inline void io_req_complete_inline(struct io_kiocb *req, s32 res,
+ u32 cflags)
+{
+ io_req_complete_state(req, res, cflags);
+ io_req_add_compl_list(req);
+}
+
+static void handle_prior_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node, struct io_ring_ctx **ctx,
+ bool *locked)
+{
+ void (*io_req_complete_func)(struct io_kiocb *, s32, u32);
+
+ do {
+ struct io_wq_work_node *next = node->next;
+ struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
+ io_task_work.node);
+
+ if (req->ctx != *ctx) {
+ if (unlikely(!*locked) && *ctx)
+ ctx_commit_and_unlock(*ctx);
+ ctx_flush_and_put(*ctx, locked);
+ *ctx = req->ctx;
+ /* if not contended, grab and improve batching */
+ *locked = mutex_trylock(&(*ctx)->uring_lock);
+ percpu_ref_get(&(*ctx)->refs);
+ if (unlikely(!*locked)) {
+ spin_lock(&(*ctx)->completion_lock);
+ io_req_complete_func = __io_req_complete_post;
+ } else {
+ io_req_complete_func = io_req_complete_inline;
+ }
+ }
+ io_req_complete_func(req, req->result, io_put_rw_kbuf(req));
+ node = next;
+ } while (node);
+
+ if (unlikely(!*locked) && *ctx)
+ ctx_commit_and_unlock(*ctx);
+}
+
static void handle_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node, struct io_ring_ctx **ctx, bool *locked)
{
do {
@@ -2250,21 +2297,28 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
task_work);
while (1) {
- struct io_wq_work_node *node;
+ struct io_wq_work_node *node1, *node2;
- if (!tctx->prior_task_list.first &&
- !tctx->task_list.first && locked)
+ if (!tctx->task_list.first &&
+ !tctx->prior_task_list.first && locked)
io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
spin_lock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- node= wq_list_merge(&tctx->prior_task_list, &tctx->task_list);
- if (!node)
+ node1 = tctx->prior_task_list.first;
+ node2 = tctx->task_list.first;
+ INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
+ INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->prior_task_list);
+ if (!node2 && !node1)
tctx->task_running = false;
spin_unlock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- if (!node)
+ if (!node2 && !node1)
break;
- handle_tw_list(node, &ctx, &locked);
+ if (node1)
+ handle_prior_tw_list(node1, &ctx, &locked);
+
+ if (node2)
+ handle_tw_list(node2, &ctx, &locked);
cond_resched();
}
--
2.24.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-27 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-26 10:07 [PATCH v6 0/6] task work optimization Hao Xu
2021-11-26 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] io-wq: add helper to merge two wq_lists Hao Xu
2021-11-26 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] io_uring: add a priority tw list for irq completion work Hao Xu
2021-11-26 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] io_uring: add helper for task work execution code Hao Xu
2021-11-26 10:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] io_uring: split io_req_complete_post() and add a helper Hao Xu
2021-11-26 10:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] io_uring: move up io_put_kbuf() and io_put_rw_kbuf() Hao Xu
2021-11-26 10:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] io_uring: batch completion in prior_task_list Hao Xu
2021-11-26 12:56 ` Hao Xu
2021-11-26 13:37 ` [PATCH RESEND " Hao Xu
2021-11-27 15:24 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-11-28 15:28 ` [PATCH v7] " Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-03 1:39 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] task work optimization Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-03 2:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-03 7:30 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-03 14:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-05 15:02 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-05 15:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-06 8:35 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-06 9:48 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-03 3:24 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-04 20:58 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-05 15:11 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox