From: Usama Arif <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], Usama Arif <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:51:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
This is done by creating a new RCU data structure (io_ev_fd) as part of
io_ring_ctx that holds the eventfd_ctx.
The function io_eventfd_signal is executed under rcu_read_lock with a
single rcu_dereference to io_ev_fd so that if another thread unregisters
the eventfd while io_eventfd_signal is still being executed, the
eventfd_signal for which io_eventfd_signal was called completes
successfully.
The process of registering/unregistering eventfd is already done
under uring_lock so multiple threads won't enter a race condition while
registering/unregistering eventfd.
With the above approach ring quiesce can be avoided which is much more
expensive then using RCU lock. On the system tested, io_uring_reigster with
IORING_REGISTER_EVENTFD takes less than 1ms with RCU lock, compared to 15ms
before with ring quiesce.
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 21531609a9c6..ad6361aeaca7 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -326,6 +326,11 @@ struct io_submit_state {
struct blk_plug plug;
};
+struct io_ev_fd {
+ struct eventfd_ctx *cq_ev_fd;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+};
+
struct io_ring_ctx {
/* const or read-mostly hot data */
struct {
@@ -399,7 +404,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
struct {
unsigned cached_cq_tail;
unsigned cq_entries;
- struct eventfd_ctx *cq_ev_fd;
+ struct io_ev_fd __rcu *io_ev_fd;
struct wait_queue_head cq_wait;
unsigned cq_extra;
atomic_t cq_timeouts;
@@ -1726,13 +1731,32 @@ static inline struct io_uring_cqe *io_get_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
return &rings->cqes[tail & mask];
}
-static inline bool io_should_trigger_evfd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+static void io_eventfd_signal(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
- if (likely(!ctx->cq_ev_fd))
- return false;
+ struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
+
+ /* Return quickly if ctx->io_ev_fd doesn't exist */
+ if (likely(!rcu_dereference_raw(ctx->io_ev_fd)))
+ return;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ /* rcu_dereference ctx->io_ev_fd once and use it for both for checking and eventfd_signal */
+ ev_fd = rcu_dereference(ctx->io_ev_fd);
+
+ /*
+ * Check again if ev_fd exists incase an io_eventfd_unregister call completed between
+ * the NULL check of ctx->io_ev_fd at the start of the function and rcu_read_lock.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!ev_fd))
+ goto out;
if (READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq_flags) & IORING_CQ_EVENTFD_DISABLED)
- return false;
- return !ctx->eventfd_async || io_wq_current_is_worker();
+ goto out;
+
+ if (!ctx->eventfd_async || io_wq_current_is_worker())
+ eventfd_signal(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
/*
@@ -1751,8 +1775,7 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
*/
if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait))
wake_up_all(&ctx->cq_wait);
- if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
- eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+ io_eventfd_signal(ctx);
}
static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -1764,8 +1787,7 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->cq_wait))
wake_up_all(&ctx->cq_wait);
}
- if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
- eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+ io_eventfd_signal(ctx);
}
/* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
@@ -9353,31 +9375,48 @@ static int __io_sqe_buffers_update(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
static int io_eventfd_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
{
+ struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
__s32 __user *fds = arg;
- int fd;
+ int fd, ret;
- if (ctx->cq_ev_fd)
+ ev_fd = rcu_dereference_protected(ctx->io_ev_fd, lockdep_is_held(&ctx->uring_lock));
+ if (ev_fd)
return -EBUSY;
if (copy_from_user(&fd, fds, sizeof(*fds)))
return -EFAULT;
- ctx->cq_ev_fd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(fd);
- if (IS_ERR(ctx->cq_ev_fd)) {
- int ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->cq_ev_fd);
+ ev_fd = kmalloc(sizeof(*ev_fd), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ev_fd)
+ return -ENOMEM;
- ctx->cq_ev_fd = NULL;
+ ev_fd->cq_ev_fd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(fd);
+ if (IS_ERR(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd);
+ kfree(ev_fd);
return ret;
}
- return 0;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ctx->io_ev_fd, ev_fd);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void io_eventfd_put(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+ struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd = container_of(rcu, struct io_ev_fd, rcu);
+
+ eventfd_ctx_put(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd);
+ kfree(ev_fd);
}
static int io_eventfd_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
- if (ctx->cq_ev_fd) {
- eventfd_ctx_put(ctx->cq_ev_fd);
- ctx->cq_ev_fd = NULL;
+ struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
+
+ ev_fd = rcu_dereference_protected(ctx->io_ev_fd, lockdep_is_held(&ctx->uring_lock));
+ if (ev_fd) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ctx->io_ev_fd, NULL);
+ call_rcu(&ev_fd->rcu, io_eventfd_put);
return 0;
}
@@ -10960,6 +10999,8 @@ static bool io_register_op_must_quiesce(int op)
case IORING_REGISTER_FILES:
case IORING_UNREGISTER_FILES:
case IORING_REGISTER_FILES_UPDATE:
+ case IORING_REGISTER_EVENTFD:
+ case IORING_UNREGISTER_EVENTFD:
case IORING_REGISTER_PROBE:
case IORING_REGISTER_PERSONALITY:
case IORING_UNREGISTER_PERSONALITY:
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-04 14:51 [PATCH v6 0/5] io_uring: remove ring quiesce in io_uring_register Usama Arif
2022-02-04 14:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] io_uring: remove trace for eventfd Usama Arif
2022-02-04 14:51 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2022-02-04 14:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering async eventfd Usama Arif
2022-02-04 14:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering restrictions and enabling rings Usama Arif
2022-02-04 14:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] io_uring: remove ring quiesce for io_uring_register Usama Arif
2022-07-15 15:44 ` Michal Koutný
2022-07-15 16:00 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-15 17:45 ` [PATCH] io_uring: Don't require reinitable percpu_ref Michal Koutný
2022-07-15 17:54 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-07-15 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] io_uring: remove ring quiesce in io_uring_register Jens Axboe
2022-02-04 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox