From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rostedt@goodmis.org,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] io-uring: Make statx API stable
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 12:01:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220226200116.mlirionrzr3ujvx4@garbanzo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225185326.1373304-2-shr@fb.com>
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:53:26AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> One of the key architectual tenets is to keep the parameters for
> io-uring stable. After the call has been submitted, its value can
> be changed. Unfortunaltely this is not the case for the current statx
> implementation.
>
> IO-Uring change:
> This changes replaces the const char * filename pointer in the io_statx
> structure with a struct filename *. In addition it also creates the
> filename object during the prepare phase.
>
> With this change, the opcode also needs to invoke cleanup, so the
> filename object gets freed after processing the request.
>
> fs change:
> This replaces the const char* __user filename parameter in the two
> functions do_statx and vfs_statx with a struct filename *. In addition
> to be able to correctly construct a filename object a new helper
> function getname_statx_lookup_flags is introduced. The function makes
> sure that do_statx and vfs_statx is invoked with the correct lookup flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
At least it doesn't break my KVM boots anymore:
Tested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-26 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 18:53 [PATCH v4 0/1] io-uring: Make statx api stable Stefan Roesch
2022-02-25 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] io-uring: Make statx API stable Stefan Roesch
2022-02-26 20:01 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2022-02-25 20:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/1] io-uring: Make statx api stable Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220226200116.mlirionrzr3ujvx4@garbanzo \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox