From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: move read/write file prep state into actual opcode handler
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:07:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
In preparation for not necessarily having a file assigned at prep time,
defer any initialization associated with the file to when the opcode
handler is run.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 900049cb6a82..52fa0613b442 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -3177,42 +3177,12 @@ static inline bool io_file_supports_nowait(struct io_kiocb *req)
static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw.kiocb;
- struct file *file = req->file;
unsigned ioprio;
int ret;
- if (!io_req_ffs_set(req))
- req->flags |= io_file_get_flags(file) << REQ_F_SUPPORT_NOWAIT_BIT;
-
kiocb->ki_pos = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
- kiocb->ki_flags = iocb_flags(file);
- ret = kiocb_set_rw_flags(kiocb, READ_ONCE(sqe->rw_flags));
- if (unlikely(ret))
- return ret;
-
- /*
- * If the file is marked O_NONBLOCK, still allow retry for it if it
- * supports async. Otherwise it's impossible to use O_NONBLOCK files
- * reliably. If not, or it IOCB_NOWAIT is set, don't retry.
- */
- if ((kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) ||
- ((file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) && !io_file_supports_nowait(req)))
- req->flags |= REQ_F_NOWAIT;
-
- if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) {
- if (!(kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) || !file->f_op->iopoll)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
- kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI | IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE;
- kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw_iopoll;
- req->iopoll_completed = 0;
- } else {
- if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
- return -EINVAL;
- kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw;
- }
+ kiocb->ki_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->rw_flags);
ioprio = READ_ONCE(sqe->ioprio);
if (ioprio) {
@@ -3731,13 +3701,6 @@ static inline int io_rw_prep_async(struct io_kiocb *req, int rw)
return 0;
}
-static int io_read_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
-{
- if (unlikely(!(req->file->f_mode & FMODE_READ)))
- return -EBADF;
- return io_prep_rw(req, sqe);
-}
-
/*
* This is our waitqueue callback handler, registered through __folio_lock_async()
* when we initially tried to do the IO with the iocb armed our waitqueue.
@@ -3825,6 +3788,50 @@ static bool need_read_all(struct io_kiocb *req)
S_ISBLK(file_inode(req->file)->i_mode);
}
+static int io_rw_init_file(struct io_kiocb *req, fmode_t mode)
+{
+ struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw.kiocb;
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+ struct file *file = req->file;
+ int rw_flags = kiocb->ki_flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (unlikely(!(file->f_mode & mode)))
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ if (!io_req_ffs_set(req))
+ req->flags |= io_file_get_flags(file) << REQ_F_SUPPORT_NOWAIT_BIT;
+
+ kiocb->ki_flags = iocb_flags(file);
+ ret = kiocb_set_rw_flags(kiocb, rw_flags);
+ if (unlikely(ret))
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * If the file is marked O_NONBLOCK, still allow retry for it if it
+ * supports async. Otherwise it's impossible to use O_NONBLOCK files
+ * reliably. If not, or it IOCB_NOWAIT is set, don't retry.
+ */
+ if ((kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) ||
+ ((file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) && !io_file_supports_nowait(req)))
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_NOWAIT;
+
+ if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) {
+ if (!(kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI | IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE;
+ kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw_iopoll;
+ req->iopoll_completed = 0;
+ } else {
+ if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_rw_state __s, *s = &__s;
@@ -3860,6 +3867,9 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
iov_iter_restore(&s->iter, &s->iter_state);
iovec = NULL;
}
+ ret = io_rw_init_file(req, FMODE_READ);
+ if (unlikely(ret))
+ goto done;
req->result = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
if (force_nonblock) {
@@ -3963,14 +3973,6 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
return 0;
}
-static int io_write_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
-{
- if (unlikely(!(req->file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)))
- return -EBADF;
- req->rw.kiocb.ki_hint = ki_hint_validate(file_write_hint(req->file));
- return io_prep_rw(req, sqe);
-}
-
static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_rw_state __s, *s = &__s;
@@ -3991,6 +3993,9 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
iov_iter_restore(&s->iter, &s->iter_state);
iovec = NULL;
}
+ ret = io_rw_init_file(req, FMODE_WRITE);
+ if (unlikely(ret))
+ goto done;
req->result = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
if (force_nonblock) {
@@ -6976,11 +6981,10 @@ static int io_req_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
case IORING_OP_READV:
case IORING_OP_READ_FIXED:
case IORING_OP_READ:
- return io_read_prep(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_WRITEV:
case IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED:
case IORING_OP_WRITE:
- return io_write_prep(req, sqe);
+ return io_prep_rw(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_POLL_ADD:
return io_poll_add_prep(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE:
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-29 17:07 [PATCHSET 0/5] Fix early file assignment for links Jens Axboe
2022-03-29 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: fail links if msg-ring doesn't succeeed Jens Axboe
2022-03-29 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: defer msg-ring file validity check until command issue Jens Axboe
2022-03-29 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: defer splice/tee " Jens Axboe
2022-03-29 17:07 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-03-29 17:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: defer file assignment for links Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-30 17:14 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Fix early file assignment for links or drain Jens Axboe
2022-03-30 17:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: move read/write file prep state into actual opcode handler Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox