From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BE9C433F5 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345509AbiC3NBl (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:01:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39918 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345503AbiC3NBi (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:01:38 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C95272E9F3; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 05:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9CE4A68AA6; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:59:47 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kanchan Joshi Cc: Kanchan Joshi , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Keith Busch , Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sbates@raithlin.com, logang@deltatee.com, Pankaj Raghav , Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= , Luis Chamberlain , Adam Manzanares , Anuj Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] nvme: enable non-inline passthru commands Message-ID: <20220330125947.GA1938@lst.de> References: <20220308152105.309618-18-joshi.k@samsung.com> <20220310083652.GF26614@lst.de> <20220310141945.GA890@lst.de> <20220311062710.GA17232@lst.de> <20220324063218.GC12660@lst.de> <20220325133921.GA13818@test-zns> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:14:13AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote: > Thinking a bit more on "(b) big-sqe + big-cqe". Will that also require > a new ioctl (other than NVME_IOCTL_IO64_CMD) in nvme? Because > semantics will be slightly different (i.e. not updating the result > inside the passthrough command but sending it out-of-band to > io_uring). Or am I just overthinking it. Again, there should be absolutely no coupling between ioctls and io_uring async cmds. The only thing trying to reuse structures or constants does is to create a lot of confusion.