From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF24C433EF for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344461AbiC3NEJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:04:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50308 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244903AbiC3NEJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:04:09 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BBE4165BA3; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 0138368AA6; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:02:19 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kanchan Joshi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Kanchan Joshi , Jens Axboe , Keith Busch , Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sbates@raithlin.com, logang@deltatee.com, Pankaj Raghav , Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= , Luis Chamberlain , Adam Manzanares , Anuj Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] nvme: enable non-inline passthru commands Message-ID: <20220330130219.GB1938@lst.de> References: <20220308152105.309618-18-joshi.k@samsung.com> <20220310083652.GF26614@lst.de> <20220310141945.GA890@lst.de> <20220311062710.GA17232@lst.de> <20220324063218.GC12660@lst.de> <20220325133921.GA13818@test-zns> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220325133921.GA13818@test-zns> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:09:21PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote: > Ok. If you are open to take new opcode/struct route, that is all we > require to pair with big-sqe and have this sorted. How about this - I would much, much, much prefer to support a bigger CQE. Having a pointer in there just creates a fair amount of overhead and really does not fit into the model nvme and io_uring use. But yes, if we did not go down that route that would be the structure that is needed.