From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/5] io_uring: add infra and support for IORING_OP_URING_CMD
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:16:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Cann we plese spell out instastructure here? Or did you mean
infraread anyway :)
> -enum io_uring_cmd_flags {
> - IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER = 1,
> - IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED = 2,
> - /* int's last bit, sign checks are usually faster than a bit test */
> - IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK = INT_MIN,
> -};
This doesn't actually get used anywhere outside of io_uring.c, so why
move it?
> +static void io_uring_cmd_work(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
> +{
> + req->uring_cmd.driver_cb(&req->uring_cmd);
> +}
> +
> +void io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
> + void (*driver_cb)(struct io_uring_cmd *))
> +{
> + struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(ioucmd, struct io_kiocb, uring_cmd);
> +
> + req->uring_cmd.driver_cb = driver_cb;
> + req->io_task_work.func = io_uring_cmd_work;
> + io_req_task_work_add(req, !!(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task);
I'm still not a fund of the double indirect call here. I don't really
have a good idea yet, but I plan to look into it.
> static void io_req_task_queue_fail(struct io_kiocb *req, int ret)
Also it would be great to not add it between io_req_task_queue_fail and
the callback set by it.
> +void io_uring_cmd_done(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd, ssize_t ret)
> +{
> + struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(ioucmd, struct io_kiocb, uring_cmd);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + req_set_fail(req);
> + io_req_complete(req, ret);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_done);
It seems like all callers of io_req_complete actually call req_set_fail
on failure. So maybe it would be nice pre-cleanup to handle the
req_set_fail call from ĩo_req_complete?
> + /* queued async, consumer will call io_uring_cmd_done() when complete */
> + if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED)
> + return 0;
> + io_uring_cmd_done(ioucmd, ret);
Why not:
if (ret != -EIOCBQUEUED)
io_uring_cmd_done(ioucmd, ret);
return 0;
That being said I wonder why not just remove the retun value from
->async_cmd entirely and just require the implementation to always call
io_uring_cmd_done? That removes the confusion on who needs to call it
entirely, similarly to what we do in the block layer for ->submit_bio.
> +struct io_uring_cmd {
> + struct file *file;
> + void *cmd;
> + /* for irq-completion - if driver requires doing stuff in task-context*/
> + void (*driver_cb)(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd);
> + u32 flags;
> + u32 cmd_op;
> + u16 cmd_len;
The cmd_len field does not seem to actually be used anywhere.
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -22,10 +22,12 @@ struct io_uring_sqe {
> union {
> __u64 off; /* offset into file */
> __u64 addr2;
> + __u32 cmd_op;
> };
> union {
> __u64 addr; /* pointer to buffer or iovecs */
> __u64 splice_off_in;
> + __u16 cmd_len;
> };
> __u32 len; /* buffer size or number of iovecs */
> union {
> @@ -60,7 +62,10 @@ struct io_uring_sqe {
> __s32 splice_fd_in;
> __u32 file_index;
> };
> - __u64 __pad2[2];
> + union {
> + __u64 __pad2[2];
> + __u64 cmd;
> + };
Can someone explain these changes to me a little more?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220401110829epcas5p39f3cf4d3f6eb8a5c59794787a2b72b15@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 0/5] big-cqe based uring-passthru Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110831epcas5p403bacabe8f7e5262356fdc1a2e66df90@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 1/5] io_uring: add support for 128-byte SQEs Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110833epcas5p18e828a307a646cef5b7aa429be4396e0@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 2/5] fs: add file_operations->async_cmd() Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110834epcas5p4d1e5e8d1beb1a6205d670bbcb932bf77@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 3/5] io_uring: add infra and support for IORING_OP_URING_CMD Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-04 8:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-05 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 6:37 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 15:14 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-05 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 16:27 ` Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110836epcas5p37bd59ab5a48cf77ca3ac05052a164b0b@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 4/5] io_uring: add support for big-cqe Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 14:04 ` Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110838epcas5p2c1a2e776923dfe5bf65a3e7946820150@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 5/5] nvme: wire-up support for async-passthru on char-device Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 14:25 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-05 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 15:40 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-05 15:49 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-06 5:20 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-06 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-23 17:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 17:38 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-29 13:16 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:21 ` [RFC 0/5] big-cqe based uring-passthru Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 15:37 ` Kanchan Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox