From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] big-cqe based uring-passthru
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:21:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
I really can't get excited about the pdu thingy. Here is a patch
(on top of the series and the patch sent in reply to patch 4) that
does away with it and just adds a oob_user field to struct io_uring_cmd
to simplify the handling a fair bit:
---
From 426fa5de1d5f5a718b797eda2fc3ea47010662f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 08:24:43 +0200
Subject: io_uring: explicit support for out of band data in io_uring_cmd
Instead of the magic pdu byte array, which in its current form causes
unaligned pointers and a lot of casting add explicit support for out
of band data in struct io_uring_cmd and just leave a normal private
data pointer to the driver.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
---
drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 35 +++++++----------------------------
include/linux/io_uring.h | 10 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c b/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
index ea6cfd4321942..b93c6ecfcd2ab 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
@@ -37,27 +37,9 @@ static int nvme_ioctl_finish_metadata(struct bio *bio, int ret,
return ret;
}
-/*
- * This overlays struct io_uring_cmd pdu.
- * Expect build errors if this grows larger than that.
- */
-struct nvme_uring_cmd_pdu {
- union {
- struct bio *bio;
- struct request *req;
- };
- void __user *meta_buffer;
-} __packed;
-
-static struct nvme_uring_cmd_pdu *nvme_uring_cmd_pdu(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
-{
- return (struct nvme_uring_cmd_pdu *)&ioucmd->pdu;
-}
-
static void nvme_uring_task_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
{
- struct nvme_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = nvme_uring_cmd_pdu(ioucmd);
- struct request *req = pdu->req;
+ struct request *req = ioucmd->private;
struct bio *bio = req->bio;
int status;
u64 result;
@@ -71,7 +53,7 @@ static void nvme_uring_task_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
blk_mq_free_request(req);
blk_rq_unmap_user(bio);
- status = nvme_ioctl_finish_metadata(bio, status, pdu->meta_buffer);
+ status = nvme_ioctl_finish_metadata(bio, status, ioucmd->oob_user);
result = le64_to_cpu(nvme_req(req)->result.u64);
io_uring_cmd_done(ioucmd, status, result);
}
@@ -79,12 +61,10 @@ static void nvme_uring_task_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
static void nvme_end_async_pt(struct request *req, blk_status_t err)
{
struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd = req->end_io_data;
- struct nvme_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = nvme_uring_cmd_pdu(ioucmd);
- /* extract bio before reusing the same field for request */
- struct bio *bio = pdu->bio;
+ struct bio *bio = ioucmd->private;
- pdu->req = req;
req->bio = bio;
+ ioucmd->private = req;
/* this takes care of moving rest of completion-work to task context */
io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(ioucmd, nvme_uring_task_cb);
@@ -381,7 +361,6 @@ static int nvme_uring_cmd_io(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_ns *ns,
{
struct nvme_passthru_cmd64 *cmd =
(struct nvme_passthru_cmd64 *)ioucmd->cmd;
- struct nvme_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = nvme_uring_cmd_pdu(ioucmd);
struct request_queue *q = ns ? ns->queue : ctrl->admin_q;
struct nvme_command c;
struct request *req;
@@ -415,10 +394,10 @@ static int nvme_uring_cmd_io(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_ns *ns,
return PTR_ERR(req);
/* to free bio on completion, as req->bio will be null at that time */
- pdu->bio = req->bio;
- pdu->meta_buffer = nvme_to_user_ptr(cmd->metadata);
- req->end_io_data = ioucmd;
+ ioucmd->private = req->bio;
+ ioucmd->oob_user = nvme_to_user_ptr(cmd->metadata);
+ req->end_io_data = ioucmd;
blk_execute_rq_nowait(req, 0, nvme_end_async_pt);
return -EIOCBQUEUED;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring.h b/include/linux/io_uring.h
index 0aba7b50cde65..95b56e45cd539 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -23,8 +23,14 @@ struct io_uring_cmd {
u32 flags;
u32 cmd_op;
u16 cmd_len;
- u16 unused;
- u8 pdu[28]; /* available inline for free use */
+
+ void *private;
+
+ /*
+ * Out of band data can be used for data that is not the main data.
+ * E.g. block device PI/metadata or additional information.
+ */
+ void __user *oob_user;
};
#if defined(CONFIG_IO_URING)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220401110829epcas5p39f3cf4d3f6eb8a5c59794787a2b72b15@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 0/5] big-cqe based uring-passthru Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110831epcas5p403bacabe8f7e5262356fdc1a2e66df90@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 1/5] io_uring: add support for 128-byte SQEs Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110833epcas5p18e828a307a646cef5b7aa429be4396e0@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 2/5] fs: add file_operations->async_cmd() Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110834epcas5p4d1e5e8d1beb1a6205d670bbcb932bf77@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 3/5] io_uring: add infra and support for IORING_OP_URING_CMD Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 8:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-05 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 6:37 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 15:14 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-05 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 16:27 ` Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110836epcas5p37bd59ab5a48cf77ca3ac05052a164b0b@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 4/5] io_uring: add support for big-cqe Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 14:04 ` Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110838epcas5p2c1a2e776923dfe5bf65a3e7946820150@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 5/5] nvme: wire-up support for async-passthru on char-device Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 14:25 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-05 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 15:40 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-05 15:49 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-06 5:20 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-06 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-23 17:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 17:38 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-29 13:16 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-05 15:37 ` [RFC 0/5] big-cqe based uring-passthru Kanchan Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox