[PATCHSET v2 next 0/5] Add support for non-IPI task_work

[PATCHSET v2 next 0/5] Add support for non-IPI task_work

[Jens Axboe]

Hi,

Unless we're using SQPOLL, any task_work queue will result in an IPI
to the target task unless it's running in the kernel already. This isn't
always needed, particularly not for the common case of not sharing the
ring. In certain workloads, this can provide a 5-10% improvement. Some
of this is due the cost of the IPI, and some from needlessly
interrupting the target task when the work could just get run when
completions are being waited for.

Patches 1..4 are prep patches, patch 5 is the actual change.

v2:
- Switch sq_flags to atomic_t and use atomic bitop helpers rather than
  add helpers using try_cmpxchg() for setting/clearing of flags.
  Suggested by Pavel.

-- 
Jens Axboe

[PATCH 1/5] task_work: allow TWA_SIGNAL without a rescheduling IPI

[Jens Axboe]

Some use cases don't always need an IPI when sending a TWA_SIGNAL
notification. Add TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI, which is just like TWA_SIGNAL,
except it doesn't send an IPI to the target task. It merely sets
TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL and wakes up the task.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 include/linux/sched/signal.h | 13 +++++++++++--
 include/linux/task_work.h    |  1 +
 kernel/task_work.c           | 15 ++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index 3c8b34876744..66b689f6cfcb 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -355,14 +355,23 @@ static inline void clear_notify_signal(void)
 	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 }
 
+/*
+ * Returns 'true' if kick_process() is needed to force a transition from
+ * user -> kernel to guarantee expedient run of TWA_SIGNAL based task_work.
+ */
+static inline bool __set_notify_signal(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	return !test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) &&
+	       !wake_up_state(task, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+}
+
 /*
  * Called to break out of interruptible wait loops, and enter the
  * exit_to_user_mode_loop().
  */
 static inline void set_notify_signal(struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	if (!test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) &&
-	    !wake_up_state(task, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE))
+	if (__set_notify_signal(task))
 		kick_process(task);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/task_work.h b/include/linux/task_work.h
index 897494b597ba..795ef5a68429 100644
--- a/include/linux/task_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/task_work.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ enum task_work_notify_mode {
 	TWA_NONE,
 	TWA_RESUME,
 	TWA_SIGNAL,
+	TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI,
 };
 
 static inline bool task_work_pending(struct task_struct *task)
diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
index c59e1a49bc40..fa8fdd04aa17 100644
--- a/kernel/task_work.c
+++ b/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ static struct callback_head work_exited; /* all we need is ->next == NULL */
  *
  * Queue @work for task_work_run() below and notify the @task if @notify
  * is @TWA_RESUME or @TWA_SIGNAL. @TWA_SIGNAL works like signals, in that the
- * it will interrupt the targeted task and run the task_work. @TWA_RESUME
- * work is run only when the task exits the kernel and returns to user mode,
- * or before entering guest mode. Fails if the @task is exiting/exited and thus
- * it can't process this @work. Otherwise @work->func() will be called when the
- * @task goes through one of the aforementioned transitions, or exits.
+ * it will interrupt the targeted task and run the task_work. @TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI
+ * works like @TWA_SIGNAL, except it doesn't send a reschedule IPI to force the
+ * targeted task to reschedule and run task_work. @TWA_RESUME work is run only
+ * when the task exits the kernel and returns to user mode, or before entering
+ * guest mode. Fails if the @task is exiting/exited and thus it can't process
+ * this @work. Otherwise @work->func() will be called when the @task goes
+ * through one of the aforementioned transitions, or exits.
  *
  * If the targeted task is exiting, then an error is returned and the work item
  * is not queued. It's up to the caller to arrange for an alternative mechanism
@@ -53,6 +55,9 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work,
 	case TWA_SIGNAL:
 		set_notify_signal(task);
 		break;
+	case TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI:
+		__set_notify_signal(task);
+		break;
 	default:
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		break;
-- 
2.35.1

[PATCH 2/5] io_uring: serialize ctx->rings->sq_flags with atomic_or/and

[Jens Axboe]

Rather than require ctx->completion_lock for ensuring that we don't
clobber the flags, use the atomic bitop helpers instead. This removes
the need to grab the completion_lock, in preparation for needing to set
or clear sq_flags when we don't know the status of this lock.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 36 ++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 626bf840bed2..4fe3a53187cf 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ struct io_rings {
 	 * The application needs a full memory barrier before checking
 	 * for IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP after updating the sq tail.
 	 */
-	u32			sq_flags;
+	atomic_t		sq_flags;
 	/*
 	 * Runtime CQ flags
 	 *
@@ -2030,8 +2030,7 @@ static bool __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force)
 	all_flushed = list_empty(&ctx->cq_overflow_list);
 	if (all_flushed) {
 		clear_bit(IO_CHECK_CQ_OVERFLOW_BIT, &ctx->check_cq);
-		WRITE_ONCE(ctx->rings->sq_flags,
-			   ctx->rings->sq_flags & ~IORING_SQ_CQ_OVERFLOW);
+		atomic_andnot(IORING_SQ_CQ_OVERFLOW, &ctx->rings->sq_flags);
 	}
 
 	io_commit_cqring(ctx);
@@ -2125,8 +2124,7 @@ static bool io_cqring_event_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data,
 	}
 	if (list_empty(&ctx->cq_overflow_list)) {
 		set_bit(IO_CHECK_CQ_OVERFLOW_BIT, &ctx->check_cq);
-		WRITE_ONCE(ctx->rings->sq_flags,
-			   ctx->rings->sq_flags | IORING_SQ_CQ_OVERFLOW);
+		atomic_or(IORING_SQ_CQ_OVERFLOW, &ctx->rings->sq_flags);
 
 	}
 	ocqe->cqe.user_data = user_data;
@@ -8105,23 +8103,6 @@ static inline bool io_sqd_events_pending(struct io_sq_data *sqd)
 	return READ_ONCE(sqd->state);
 }
 
-static inline void io_ring_set_wakeup_flag(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-{
-	/* Tell userspace we may need a wakeup call */
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	WRITE_ONCE(ctx->rings->sq_flags,
-		   ctx->rings->sq_flags | IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP);
-	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-}
-
-static inline void io_ring_clear_wakeup_flag(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-{
-	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	WRITE_ONCE(ctx->rings->sq_flags,
-		   ctx->rings->sq_flags & ~IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP);
-	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-}
-
 static int __io_sq_thread(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool cap_entries)
 {
 	unsigned int to_submit;
@@ -8237,8 +8218,8 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
 			bool needs_sched = true;
 
 			list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
-				io_ring_set_wakeup_flag(ctx);
-
+				atomic_or(IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP,
+						&ctx->rings->sq_flags);
 				if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) &&
 				    !wq_list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list)) {
 					needs_sched = false;
@@ -8263,7 +8244,8 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
 				mutex_lock(&sqd->lock);
 			}
 			list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list)
-				io_ring_clear_wakeup_flag(ctx);
+				atomic_andnot(IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP,
+						&ctx->rings->sq_flags);
 		}
 
 		finish_wait(&sqd->wait, &wait);
@@ -8273,7 +8255,7 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
 	io_uring_cancel_generic(true, sqd);
 	sqd->thread = NULL;
 	list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list)
-		io_ring_set_wakeup_flag(ctx);
+		atomic_or(IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP, &ctx->rings->sq_flags);
 	io_run_task_work();
 	mutex_unlock(&sqd->lock);
 
@@ -12026,6 +12008,8 @@ static int __init io_uring_init(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(io_op_defs) != IORING_OP_LAST);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(__REQ_F_LAST_BIT > 8 * sizeof(int));
 
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(atomic_t) != sizeof(u32));
+
 	req_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(io_kiocb, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC |
 				SLAB_ACCOUNT);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.35.1

[PATCH 3/5] io-wq: use __set_notify_signal() to wake workers

[Jens Axboe]

The only difference between set_notify_signal() and __set_notify_signal()
is that the former checks if it needs to deliver an IPI to force a
reschedule. As the io-wq workers never leave the kernel, and IPI is never
needed, they simply need a wakeup.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 fs/io-wq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 32aeb2c581c5..824623bcf1a5 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static bool io_wq_for_each_worker(struct io_wqe *wqe,
 
 static bool io_wq_worker_wake(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
 {
-	set_notify_signal(worker->task);
+	__set_notify_signal(worker->task);
 	wake_up_process(worker->task);
 	return false;
 }
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static bool __io_wq_worker_cancel(struct io_worker *worker,
 {
 	if (work && match->fn(work, match->data)) {
 		work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
-		set_notify_signal(worker->task);
+		__set_notify_signal(worker->task);
 		return true;
 	}
 
-- 
2.35.1

[PATCH 4/5] io_uring: set task_work notify method at init time

[Jens Axboe]

While doing so, switch SQPOLL to TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI as well, as that
just does a task wakeup and then we can remove the special wakeup we
have in task_work_add.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 4fe3a53187cf..45992ada2f06 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
 
 		struct io_rings		*rings;
 		unsigned int		flags;
+		enum task_work_notify_mode	notify_method;
 		unsigned int		compat: 1;
 		unsigned int		drain_next: 1;
 		unsigned int		restricted: 1;
@@ -2621,8 +2622,8 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
 static void io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool priority)
 {
 	struct task_struct *tsk = req->task;
+	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 	struct io_uring_task *tctx = tsk->io_uring;
-	enum task_work_notify_mode notify;
 	struct io_wq_work_node *node;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool running;
@@ -2645,18 +2646,8 @@ static void io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool priority)
 	if (running)
 		return;
 
-	/*
-	 * SQPOLL kernel thread doesn't need notification, just a wakeup. For
-	 * all other cases, use TWA_SIGNAL unconditionally to ensure we're
-	 * processing task_work. There's no reliable way to tell if TWA_RESUME
-	 * will do the job.
-	 */
-	notify = (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) ? TWA_NONE : TWA_SIGNAL;
-	if (likely(!task_work_add(tsk, &tctx->task_work, notify))) {
-		if (notify == TWA_NONE)
-			wake_up_process(tsk);
+	if (likely(!task_work_add(tsk, &tctx->task_work, ctx->notify_method)))
 		return;
-	}
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
 	tctx->task_running = false;
@@ -11332,6 +11323,14 @@ static __cold int io_uring_create(unsigned entries, struct io_uring_params *p,
 	if (!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
 		ctx->user = get_uid(current_user());
 
+	/*
+	 * For SQPOLL, we just need a wakeup, always.
+	 */
+	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)
+		ctx->notify_method = TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI;
+	else
+		ctx->notify_method = TWA_SIGNAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * This is just grabbed for accounting purposes. When a process exits,
 	 * the mm is exited and dropped before the files, hence we need to hang
-- 
2.35.1

[PATCH 5/5] io_uring: use TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI if IORING_SETUP_NO_RESCHED is used

[Jens Axboe]

If this is set, io_uring will never use an IPI to deliver a task_work
notification. This can be used in the common case where a single task or
thread communicates with the ring, and doesn't rely on
io_uring_cqe_peek().

This provides a noticeable win in performance, both from eliminating
the IPI itself, but also from avoiding interrupting the submitting
task unnecessarily.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 fs/io_uring.c                 | 8 +++++---
 include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 45992ada2f06..7824a615f06d 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -11324,9 +11324,10 @@ static __cold int io_uring_create(unsigned entries, struct io_uring_params *p,
 		ctx->user = get_uid(current_user());
 
 	/*
-	 * For SQPOLL, we just need a wakeup, always.
+	 * For SQPOLL, we just need a wakeup, always. For !SQPOLL, if
+	 * NO_RESCHED is set, then IPIs are never needed by the app.
 	 */
-	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)
+	if (ctx->flags & (IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL|IORING_SETUP_NO_RESCHED))
 		ctx->notify_method = TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI;
 	else
 		ctx->notify_method = TWA_SIGNAL;
@@ -11428,7 +11429,8 @@ static long io_uring_setup(u32 entries, struct io_uring_params __user *params)
 	if (p.flags & ~(IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL | IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL |
 			IORING_SETUP_SQ_AFF | IORING_SETUP_CQSIZE |
 			IORING_SETUP_CLAMP | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ |
-			IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED | IORING_SETUP_SUBMIT_ALL))
+			IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED | IORING_SETUP_SUBMIT_ALL |
+			IORING_SETUP_NO_RESCHED))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return  io_uring_create(entries, &p, params);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index 980d82eb196e..8a32230aa6f4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ enum {
 #define IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ	(1U << 5)	/* attach to existing wq */
 #define IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED	(1U << 6)	/* start with ring disabled */
 #define IORING_SETUP_SUBMIT_ALL	(1U << 7)	/* continue submit on error */
+#define IORING_SETUP_NO_RESCHED	(1U << 8)	/* work doesn't need resched */
 
 enum {
 	IORING_OP_NOP,
-- 
2.35.1

[PATCHSET next 0/5] Add support for non-IPI task_work

[Jens Axboe]

Hi,

Unless we're using SQPOLL, any task_work queue will result in an IPI
to the target task unless it's running in the kernel already. This isn't
always needed, particularly not for the common case of not sharing the
ring. In certain workloads, this can provide a 5-10% improvement. Some
of this is due the cost of the IPI, and some from needlessly
interrupting the target task when the work could just get run when
completions are being waited for.

Patches 1..4 are prep patches, patch 5 is the actual change.

-- 
Jens Axboe

[PATCH 1/5] task_work: allow TWA_SIGNAL without a rescheduling IPI

[Jens Axboe]

Some use cases don't always need an IPI when sending a TWA_SIGNAL
notification. Add TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI, which is just like TWA_SIGNAL,
except it doesn't send an IPI to the target task. It merely sets
TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL and wakes up the task.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 include/linux/sched/signal.h | 13 +++++++++++--
 include/linux/task_work.h    |  1 +
 kernel/task_work.c           | 15 ++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index 3c8b34876744..66b689f6cfcb 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -355,14 +355,23 @@ static inline void clear_notify_signal(void)
 	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 }
 
+/*
+ * Returns 'true' if kick_process() is needed to force a transition from
+ * user -> kernel to guarantee expedient run of TWA_SIGNAL based task_work.
+ */
+static inline bool __set_notify_signal(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	return !test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) &&
+	       !wake_up_state(task, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+}
+
 /*
  * Called to break out of interruptible wait loops, and enter the
  * exit_to_user_mode_loop().
  */
 static inline void set_notify_signal(struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	if (!test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) &&
-	    !wake_up_state(task, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE))
+	if (__set_notify_signal(task))
 		kick_process(task);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/task_work.h b/include/linux/task_work.h
index 897494b597ba..795ef5a68429 100644
--- a/include/linux/task_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/task_work.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ enum task_work_notify_mode {
 	TWA_NONE,
 	TWA_RESUME,
 	TWA_SIGNAL,
+	TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI,
 };
 
 static inline bool task_work_pending(struct task_struct *task)
diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
index c59e1a49bc40..fa8fdd04aa17 100644
--- a/kernel/task_work.c
+++ b/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ static struct callback_head work_exited; /* all we need is ->next == NULL */
  *
  * Queue @work for task_work_run() below and notify the @task if @notify
  * is @TWA_RESUME or @TWA_SIGNAL. @TWA_SIGNAL works like signals, in that the
- * it will interrupt the targeted task and run the task_work. @TWA_RESUME
- * work is run only when the task exits the kernel and returns to user mode,
- * or before entering guest mode. Fails if the @task is exiting/exited and thus
- * it can't process this @work. Otherwise @work->func() will be called when the
- * @task goes through one of the aforementioned transitions, or exits.
+ * it will interrupt the targeted task and run the task_work. @TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI
+ * works like @TWA_SIGNAL, except it doesn't send a reschedule IPI to force the
+ * targeted task to reschedule and run task_work. @TWA_RESUME work is run only
+ * when the task exits the kernel and returns to user mode, or before entering
+ * guest mode. Fails if the @task is exiting/exited and thus it can't process
+ * this @work. Otherwise @work->func() will be called when the @task goes
+ * through one of the aforementioned transitions, or exits.
  *
  * If the targeted task is exiting, then an error is returned and the work item
  * is not queued. It's up to the caller to arrange for an alternative mechanism
@@ -53,6 +55,9 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work,
 	case TWA_SIGNAL:
 		set_notify_signal(task);
 		break;
+	case TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI:
+		__set_notify_signal(task);
+		break;
 	default:
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		break;
-- 
2.35.1