From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCHSET v2 RFC 0/11] Add support for ring mapped provided buffers
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:56:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Hi,
This series builds to adding support for a different way of doing
provided buffers. The interesting bits here are patch 11, which also has
some performance numbers an an explanation of it.
Patches 1..5 are cleanups that should just applied separately, I
think the clean up the existing code quite nicely.
Patch 6 is a generic optimization for the buffer list lookups.
Patch 7 adds NOP support for provided buffers, just so that we can
benchmark the last change.
Patches 8..10 are prep for patch 11.
Patch 11 finally adds the feature.
This passes the full liburing suite - obviously this just means that it
didn't break anything existing (that I know of), the only test case for
the ring buffers is the nop peak benchmark referenced in patch 11.
v2: - Minor optimizations
- Fix 4k PAGE_SIZE assumption
- Style cleanup
Can also be found in my git repo, for-5.19/io_uring-pbuf branch:
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-5.19/io_uring-pbuf
fs/io_uring.c | 463 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 26 ++
2 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 17:56 Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 01/11] io_uring: kill io_recv_buffer_select() wrapper Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 02/11] io_uring: make io_buffer_select() return the user address directly Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 03/11] io_uring: kill io_rw_buffer_select() wrapper Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 04/11] io_uring: ignore ->buf_index if REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT isn't set Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 05/11] io_uring: always use req->buf_index for the provided buffer group Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 06/11] io_uring: cache last io_buffer_list lookup Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 07/11] io_uring: add buffer selection support to IORING_OP_NOP Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 08/11] io_uring: add io_pin_pages() helper Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 09/11] io_uring: abstract out provided buffer list selection Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 10/11] io_uring: relocate io_buffer_get_list() Jens Axboe
2022-04-29 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/11] io_uring: add support for ring mapped supplied buffers Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 13:14 ` [PATCHSET v2 RFC 0/11] Add support for ring mapped provided buffers Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-01 13:28 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 13:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-01 14:25 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-01 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox