From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] io_uring: let fast poll support multishot
Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 01:15:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
For operations like accept, multishot is a useful feature, since we can
reduce a number of accept sqe. Let's integrate it to fast poll, it may
be good for other operations in the future.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index c2ee184ac693..e0d12af04cd1 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5955,6 +5955,7 @@ static void io_poll_remove_entries(struct io_kiocb *req)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
+static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
/*
* All poll tw should go through this. Checks for poll events, manages
* references, does rewait, etc.
@@ -5963,10 +5964,10 @@ static void io_poll_remove_entries(struct io_kiocb *req)
* either spurious wakeup or multishot CQE is served. 0 when it's done with
* the request, then the mask is stored in req->cqe.res.
*/
-static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req, bool locked)
+static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- int v;
+ int v, ret;
/* req->task == current here, checking PF_EXITING is safe */
if (unlikely(req->task->flags & PF_EXITING))
@@ -5990,23 +5991,37 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req, bool locked)
req->cqe.res = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & req->apoll_events;
}
- /* multishot, just fill an CQE and proceed */
- if (req->cqe.res && !(req->apoll_events & EPOLLONESHOT)) {
- __poll_t mask = mangle_poll(req->cqe.res & req->apoll_events);
+ if ((unlikely(!req->cqe.res)))
+ continue;
+ if (req->apoll_events & EPOLLONESHOT)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* multishot, just fill a CQE and proceed */
+ if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT)) {
+ __poll_t mask = mangle_poll(req->cqe.res &
+ req->apoll_events);
bool filled;
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
- filled = io_fill_cqe_aux(ctx, req->cqe.user_data, mask,
- IORING_CQE_F_MORE);
+ filled = io_fill_cqe_aux(ctx, req->cqe.user_data,
+ mask, IORING_CQE_F_MORE);
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
- if (unlikely(!filled))
- return -ECANCELED;
- io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
- } else if (req->cqe.res) {
- return 0;
+ if (filled) {
+ io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+ continue;
+ }
+ return -ECANCELED;
}
+ io_tw_lock(req->ctx, locked);
+ if (unlikely(req->task->flags & PF_EXITING))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ ret = io_issue_sqe(req,
+ IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK|IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
/*
* Release all references, retry if someone tried to restart
* task_work while we were executing it.
@@ -6021,7 +6036,7 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
int ret;
- ret = io_poll_check_events(req, *locked);
+ ret = io_poll_check_events(req, locked);
if (ret > 0)
return;
@@ -6046,7 +6061,7 @@ static void io_apoll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
int ret;
- ret = io_poll_check_events(req, *locked);
+ ret = io_poll_check_events(req, locked);
if (ret > 0)
return;
@@ -6286,7 +6301,7 @@ static int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct async_poll *apoll;
struct io_poll_table ipt;
- __poll_t mask = EPOLLONESHOT | POLLERR | POLLPRI;
+ __poll_t mask = POLLERR | POLLPRI;
int ret;
if (!def->pollin && !def->pollout)
@@ -6295,6 +6310,8 @@ static int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
return IO_APOLL_ABORTED;
if ((req->flags & (REQ_F_POLLED|REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO)) == REQ_F_POLLED)
return IO_APOLL_ABORTED;
+ if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT))
+ mask |= EPOLLONESHOT;
if (def->pollin) {
mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-07 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[email protected]>
2022-05-07 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] io_uring: add IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT for accept Hao Xu
2022-05-07 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] io_uring: add REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT for requests Hao Xu
2022-05-07 17:15 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2022-05-07 17:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept Hao Xu
2022-05-14 14:20 [PATCH v6 0/4] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu
2022-05-14 14:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] io_uring: let fast poll support multishot Hao Xu
[not found] <[email protected]>
2022-05-08 15:37 ` Hao Xu
[not found] <[email protected]>
2022-05-08 15:32 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-10 3:20 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-07 14:06 [PATCH v3 0/4] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu
2022-05-07 14:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] io_uring: let fast poll support multishot Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox