From: Oliver Sang <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: LKML <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [io_uring] 584b0180f0: phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.IO_uring.Yes.Yes.1MB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s -10.2% regression
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:00:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220608080054.GB22428@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Hi Jens Axboe,
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 07:50:27AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/27/22 3:24 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> >
> >
> > Greeting,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed a -10.2% regression of phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.IO_uring.Yes.Yes.1MB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s due to commit:
> >
> >
> > commit: 584b0180f0f4d67d7145950fe68c625f06c88b10 ("io_uring: move read/write file prep state into actual opcode handler")
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> >
> > in testcase: phoronix-test-suite
> > on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 512G memory
> > with following parameters:
> >
> > test: fio-1.14.1
> > option_a: Sequential Write
> > option_b: IO_uring
> > option_c: Yes
> > option_d: Yes
> > option_e: 1MB
> > option_f: Default Test Directory
> > cpufreq_governor: performance
> > ucode: 0x500320a
> >
> > test-description: The Phoronix Test Suite is the most comprehensive testing and benchmarking platform available that provides an extensible framework for which new tests can be easily added.
> > test-url: http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
>
> I'm a bit skeptical on this, but I'd like to try and run the test case.
> Since it's just a fio test case, why can't I find it somewhere? Seems
> very convoluted to have to setup lkp-tests just for this. Besides, I
> tried, but it doesn't work on aarch64...
we just follow doc on http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ to run tests in PTS
framework, so you don't need to care about lkp-tests.
and for this fio test, the parameters we used just as:
test: fio-1.14.1
option_a: Sequential Write
option_b: IO_uring
option_c: Yes
option_d: Yes
option_e: 1MB
option_f: Default Test Directory
and yeah, we most focus on x86_64 and don't support lkp-tests to run on
aarch64...
if you have some idea that we could run other tests, could you let us know?
it will be great pleasure to run more tests to check for us if we can support.
Thanks a lot!
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-08 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220527092432.GE11731@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
2022-05-27 13:50 ` [io_uring] 584b0180f0: phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.IO_uring.Yes.Yes.1MB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s -10.2% regression Jens Axboe
2022-06-08 8:00 ` Oliver Sang [this message]
2022-06-14 1:54 ` [LKP] " Yin Fengwei
2022-07-12 8:06 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-15 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-18 0:58 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-18 1:14 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-18 3:30 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-18 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-19 0:27 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-19 2:16 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-19 2:29 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-19 8:58 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-20 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-20 18:13 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-20 23:25 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-21 2:59 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-07-21 3:08 ` Yin Fengwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220608080054.GB22428@xsang-OptiPlex-9020 \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox