From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH RFC for-next 6/8] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 09:18:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
The TP_printk macro's are not supposed to use custom code ([1]) or else
tools such as perf cannot use these events.
Convert the opcode string representation to use the __string wiring that
the event framework provides ([2]).
[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/379903/
[2]: https://lwn.net/Articles/381064/
Fixes: 033b87d2 ("io_uring: use the text representation of ops in trace")
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
---
include/trace/events/io_uring.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/io_uring.h b/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
index 5635912e1013..3bc8dec9acaa 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
@@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_queue_async_work,
__field( unsigned int, flags )
__field( struct io_wq_work *, work )
__field( int, rw )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -161,11 +163,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_queue_async_work,
__entry->opcode = req->opcode;
__entry->work = &req->work;
__entry->rw = rw;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%x, %s queue, work %p",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->flags, __entry->rw ? "hashed" : "normal", __entry->work)
);
@@ -188,6 +192,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_defer,
__field( void *, req )
__field( unsigned long long, data )
__field( u8, opcode )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -195,11 +201,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_defer,
__entry->req = req;
__entry->data = req->cqe.user_data;
__entry->opcode = req->opcode;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode))
+ __get_str(op_str))
);
/**
@@ -284,6 +292,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_fail_link,
__field( unsigned long long, user_data )
__field( u8, opcode )
__field( void *, link )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -292,11 +302,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_fail_link,
__entry->user_data = req->cqe.user_data;
__entry->opcode = req->opcode;
__entry->link = link;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, link %p",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode), __entry->link)
+ __get_str(op_str), __entry->link)
);
/**
@@ -370,6 +382,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
__field( u32, flags )
__field( bool, force_nonblock )
__field( bool, sq_thread )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -380,11 +394,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
__entry->flags = req->flags;
__entry->force_nonblock = force_nonblock;
__entry->sq_thread = req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%x, "
"non block %d, sq_thread %d", __entry->ctx, __entry->req,
- __entry->user_data, io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __entry->user_data, __get_str(op_str),
__entry->flags, __entry->force_nonblock, __entry->sq_thread)
);
@@ -411,6 +427,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_poll_arm,
__field( u8, opcode )
__field( int, mask )
__field( int, events )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -420,11 +438,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_poll_arm,
__entry->opcode = req->opcode;
__entry->mask = mask;
__entry->events = events;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, mask 0x%x, events 0x%x",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->mask, __entry->events)
);
@@ -447,6 +467,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_task_add,
__field( unsigned long long, user_data )
__field( u8, opcode )
__field( int, mask )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -455,11 +477,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_task_add,
__entry->user_data = req->cqe.user_data;
__entry->opcode = req->opcode;
__entry->mask = mask;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, mask %x",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->mask)
);
@@ -495,6 +519,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_req_failed,
__field( u64, pad1 )
__field( u64, addr3 )
__field( int, error )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(sqe->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -514,6 +540,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_req_failed,
__entry->pad1 = sqe->__pad2[0];
__entry->addr3 = sqe->addr3;
__entry->error = error;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(sqe->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, "
@@ -522,7 +550,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_req_failed,
"personality=%d, file_index=%d, pad=0x%llx, addr3=%llx, "
"error=%d",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->flags, __entry->ioprio,
(unsigned long long)__entry->off,
(unsigned long long) __entry->addr, __entry->len,
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-20 16:18 [PATCH RFC for-next 0/8] io_uring: tw contention improvments Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-20 16:18 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 1/8] io_uring: remove priority tw list optimisation Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-20 16:18 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 2/8] io_uring: remove __io_req_task_work_add Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-20 16:18 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 3/8] io_uring: lockless task list Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-20 16:18 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 4/8] io_uring: introduce llist helpers Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-20 16:18 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 5/8] io_uring: batch task_work Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-20 16:18 ` Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-06-20 16:19 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 7/8] io_uring: add trace event for running task work Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-20 16:19 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 8/8] io_uring: trace task_work_run Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-21 5:10 ` [PATCH RFC for-next 0/8] io_uring: tw contention improvments Hao Xu
2022-06-21 7:03 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-21 7:34 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-22 9:31 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 11:16 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-22 11:24 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-22 11:51 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 12:28 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-22 12:29 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-22 11:52 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-21 7:38 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox