From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v2 for-next 3/8] io_uring: lockless task list
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:40:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
With networking use cases we see contention on the spinlock used to
protect the task_list when multiple threads try and add completions at once.
Instead we can use a lockless list, and assume that the first caller to
add to the list is responsible for kicking off task work.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 2 +-
io_uring/io_uring.c | 38 ++++++++--------------------------
io_uring/tctx.c | 3 +--
io_uring/tctx.h | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 5987f8acca38..918165a20053 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ typedef void (*io_req_tw_func_t)(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked);
struct io_task_work {
union {
- struct io_wq_work_node node;
+ struct llist_node node;
struct llist_node fallback_node;
};
io_req_tw_func_t func;
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index e1523b62103b..985b46dfebb6 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -986,11 +986,12 @@ static void ctx_flush_and_put(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)
percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
}
-static void handle_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node,
+
+static void handle_tw_list(struct llist_node *node,
struct io_ring_ctx **ctx, bool *locked)
{
do {
- struct io_wq_work_node *next = node->next;
+ struct llist_node *next = node->next;
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
io_task_work.node);
@@ -1014,23 +1015,11 @@ void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = NULL;
struct io_uring_task *tctx = container_of(cb, struct io_uring_task,
task_work);
+ struct llist_node *node = llist_del_all(&tctx->task_list);
- while (1) {
- struct io_wq_work_node *node;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- node = tctx->task_list.first;
- INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
- if (!node)
- tctx->task_running = false;
- spin_unlock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- if (!node)
- break;
+ if (node) {
handle_tw_list(node, &ctx, &uring_locked);
cond_resched();
-
- if (data_race(!tctx->task_list.first) && uring_locked)
- io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
}
ctx_flush_and_put(ctx, &uring_locked);
@@ -1044,16 +1033,10 @@ void io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
struct io_uring_task *tctx = req->task->io_uring;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- struct io_wq_work_node *node;
- unsigned long flags;
+ struct llist_node *node;
bool running;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
- wq_list_add_tail(&req->io_task_work.node, &tctx->task_list);
- running = tctx->task_running;
- if (!running)
- tctx->task_running = true;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
+ running = !llist_add(&req->io_task_work.node, &tctx->task_list);
/* task_work already pending, we're done */
if (running)
@@ -1065,11 +1048,8 @@ void io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
if (likely(!task_work_add(req->task, &tctx->task_work, ctx->notify_method)))
return;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
- tctx->task_running = false;
- node = tctx->task_list.first;
- INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
+
+ node = llist_del_all(&tctx->task_list);
while (node) {
req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb, io_task_work.node);
diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.c b/io_uring/tctx.c
index 7a68ba9beec3..7f97d97fef0a 100644
--- a/io_uring/tctx.c
+++ b/io_uring/tctx.c
@@ -86,8 +86,7 @@ __cold int io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *task,
atomic_set(&tctx->in_idle, 0);
atomic_set(&tctx->inflight_tracked, 0);
task->io_uring = tctx;
- spin_lock_init(&tctx->task_lock);
- INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
+ init_llist_head(&tctx->task_list);
init_task_work(&tctx->task_work, tctx_task_work);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.h b/io_uring/tctx.h
index c8566ea5dca4..8a33ff6e5d91 100644
--- a/io_uring/tctx.h
+++ b/io_uring/tctx.h
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/llist.h>
+
/*
* Arbitrary limit, can be raised if need be
*/
@@ -19,9 +21,7 @@ struct io_uring_task {
struct percpu_counter inflight;
struct { /* task_work */
- spinlock_t task_lock;
- bool task_running;
- struct io_wq_work_list task_list;
+ struct llist_head task_list;
struct callback_head task_work;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 13:40 [PATCH v2 for-next 0/8] io_uring: tw contention improvments Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 1/8] io_uring: remove priority tw list optimisation Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 2/8] io_uring: remove __io_req_task_work_add Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 13:40 ` Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-06-22 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 4/8] io_uring: introduce llist helpers Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 5/8] io_uring: batch task_work Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 6/8] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 7/8] io_uring: add trace event for running task work Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 8/8] io_uring: trace task_work_run Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-22 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 0/8] io_uring: tw contention improvments Jens Axboe
2022-06-23 8:23 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-22 17:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox