From: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
To: Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing v2 4/5] test: add io_uring passthrough test
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 23:34:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727180426.GA13647@test-zns> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5420 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:22:29PM +0530, Ankit Kumar wrote:
>Add a way to test uring passthrough commands, which was added
>with 5.19 kernel. This requires nvme-ns character device (/dev/ngXnY)
>as filename argument. It runs a combination of read/write tests with
>sqthread poll, vectored and non-vectored commands, fixed I/O buffers.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>
>---
> test/Makefile | 1 +
> test/io_uring_passthrough.c | 319 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 320 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 test/io_uring_passthrough.c
>
>diff --git a/test/Makefile b/test/Makefile
>index a36ddb3..418c11c 100644
>--- a/test/Makefile
>+++ b/test/Makefile
>@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ test_srcs := \
> io-cancel.c \
> iopoll.c \
> io_uring_enter.c \
>+ io_uring_passthrough.c \
> io_uring_register.c \
> io_uring_setup.c \
> lfs-openat.c \
>diff --git a/test/io_uring_passthrough.c b/test/io_uring_passthrough.c
>new file mode 100644
>index 0000000..2e2b806
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/test/io_uring_passthrough.c
>@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
>+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>+/*
>+ * Description: basic read/write tests for io_uring passthrough commands
>+ */
>+#include <errno.h>
>+#include <stdio.h>
>+#include <unistd.h>
>+#include <stdlib.h>
>+#include <string.h>
>+
>+#include "helpers.h"
>+#include "liburing.h"
>+#include "nvme.h"
>+
>+#define FILE_SIZE (256 * 1024)
>+#define BS 8192
>+#define BUFFERS (FILE_SIZE / BS)
>+
>+static struct iovec *vecs;
>+
>+/*
>+ * Each offset in the file has the ((test_case / 2) * FILE_SIZE)
>+ * + (offset / sizeof(int)) stored for every
>+ * sizeof(int) address.
>+ */
>+static int verify_buf(int tc, void *buf, off_t off)
>+{
>+ int i, u_in_buf = BS / sizeof(unsigned int);
>+ unsigned int *ptr;
>+
>+ off /= sizeof(unsigned int);
>+ off += (tc / 2) * FILE_SIZE;
>+ ptr = buf;
>+ for (i = 0; i < u_in_buf; i++) {
>+ if (off != *ptr) {
>+ fprintf(stderr, "Found %u, wanted %lu\n", *ptr, off);
>+ return 1;
>+ }
>+ ptr++;
>+ off++;
>+ }
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int fill_pattern(int tc)
>+{
>+ unsigned int val, *ptr;
>+ int i, j;
>+ int u_in_buf = BS / sizeof(val);
>+
>+ val = (tc / 2) * FILE_SIZE;
>+ for (i = 0; i < BUFFERS; i++) {
>+ ptr = vecs[i].iov_base;
>+ for (j = 0; j < u_in_buf; j++) {
>+ *ptr = val;
>+ val++;
>+ ptr++;
>+ }
>+ }
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int __test_io(const char *file, struct io_uring *ring, int tc, int read,
>+ int sqthread, int fixed, int nonvec)
>+{
>+ struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
>+ struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
>+ struct nvme_uring_cmd *cmd;
>+ int open_flags;
>+ int do_fixed;
>+ int i, ret, fd = -1;
>+ off_t offset;
>+ __u64 slba;
>+ __u32 nlb;
>+
>+#ifdef VERBOSE
>+ fprintf(stdout, "%s: start %d/%d/%d/%d: ", __FUNCTION__, read,
>+ sqthread, fixed,
>+ nonvec);
>+#endif
>+ if (read)
>+ open_flags = O_RDONLY;
>+ else
>+ open_flags = O_WRONLY;
>+
>+ if (fixed) {
>+ ret = t_register_buffers(ring, vecs, BUFFERS);
>+ if (ret == T_SETUP_SKIP)
>+ return 0;
>+ if (ret != T_SETUP_OK) {
>+ fprintf(stderr, "buffer reg failed: %d\n", ret);
>+ goto err;
>+ }
>+ }
>+
>+ fd = open(file, open_flags);
>+ if (fd < 0) {
>+ perror("file open");
>+ goto err;
>+ }
>+
>+ if (sqthread) {
>+ ret = io_uring_register_files(ring, &fd, 1);
>+ if (ret) {
>+ fprintf(stderr, "file reg failed: %d\n", ret);
>+ goto err;
>+ }
>+ }
>+
>+ if (!read)
>+ fill_pattern(tc);
>+
>+ offset = 0;
>+ for (i = 0; i < BUFFERS; i++) {
>+ sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring);
>+ if (!sqe) {
>+ fprintf(stderr, "sqe get failed\n");
>+ goto err;
>+ }
>+ if (read) {
>+ int use_fd = fd;
>+
>+ do_fixed = fixed;
>+
>+ if (sqthread)
>+ use_fd = 0;
>+ if (fixed && (i & 1))
>+ do_fixed = 0;
>+ if (do_fixed) {
>+ io_uring_prep_read_fixed(sqe, use_fd, vecs[i].iov_base,
>+ vecs[i].iov_len,
>+ offset, i);
>+ sqe->cmd_op = NVME_URING_CMD_IO;
>+ } else if (nonvec) {
>+ io_uring_prep_read(sqe, use_fd, vecs[i].iov_base,
>+ vecs[i].iov_len, offset);
>+ sqe->cmd_op = NVME_URING_CMD_IO;
>+ } else {
>+ io_uring_prep_readv(sqe, use_fd, &vecs[i], 1,
>+ offset);
>+ sqe->cmd_op = NVME_URING_CMD_IO_VEC;
>+ }
>+ } else {
>+ int use_fd = fd;
>+
>+ do_fixed = fixed;
>+
>+ if (sqthread)
>+ use_fd = 0;
>+ if (fixed && (i & 1))
>+ do_fixed = 0;
>+ if (do_fixed) {
>+ io_uring_prep_write_fixed(sqe, use_fd, vecs[i].iov_base,
>+ vecs[i].iov_len,
>+ offset, i);
>+ sqe->cmd_op = NVME_URING_CMD_IO;
>+ } else if (nonvec) {
>+ io_uring_prep_write(sqe, use_fd, vecs[i].iov_base,
>+ vecs[i].iov_len, offset);
>+ sqe->cmd_op = NVME_URING_CMD_IO;
>+ } else {
>+ io_uring_prep_writev(sqe, use_fd, &vecs[i], 1,
>+ offset);
>+ sqe->cmd_op = NVME_URING_CMD_IO_VEC;
>+ }
>+ }
>+ sqe->opcode = IORING_OP_URING_CMD;
>+ sqe->user_data = ((uint64_t)offset << 32) | i;
>+ if (sqthread)
>+ sqe->flags |= IOSQE_FIXED_FILE;
>+
>+ /* 80 bytes for NVMe uring passthrough command */
>+ cmd = (struct nvme_uring_cmd *)sqe->cmd;
>+ memset(cmd, 0, sizeof(struct nvme_uring_cmd));
The above 80 bytes commment does not serve much purpose since
you are using sizeof(struct nvme_uring_cmd) anyway and do not use the
magic number. Moreover actual size is 72 bytes. But this is a nit and
things look fine to me, so -
Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-27 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220726105812epcas5p4a2946262206548f67e238845e23a122c@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-07-26 10:52 ` [PATCH liburing v2 0/5] Add basic test for nvme uring passthrough commands Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220726105813epcas5p44c4058c9d3e9332ef939dbbb9a052738@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-07-26 10:52 ` [PATCH liburing v2 1/5] configure: check for nvme uring command support Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220726105814epcas5p4b454a04c6f7befa23788b5a6bf3031c3@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-07-26 10:52 ` [PATCH liburing v2 2/5] io_uring.h: sync sqe entry with 5.20 io_uring Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220726105815epcas5p2e19ff2fe748cfeb69517124370de3b7f@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-07-26 10:52 ` [PATCH liburing v2 3/5] nvme: add nvme opcodes, structures and helper functions Ankit Kumar
2022-07-27 18:24 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <CGME20220726105816epcas5p3365fed54f9ba20518dd8019a50c6c27c@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-07-26 10:52 ` [PATCH liburing v2 4/5] test: add io_uring passthrough test Ankit Kumar
2022-07-27 18:04 ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2022-07-27 18:26 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <CGME20220726105817epcas5p450a87008879689894b187924a854d513@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-07-26 10:52 ` [PATCH liburing v2 5/5] test/io_uring_passthrough: add test case for poll IO Ankit Kumar
2022-07-27 18:27 ` [PATCH liburing v2 0/5] Add basic test for nvme uring passthrough commands Kanchan Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220727180426.GA13647@test-zns \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox