public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>, Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
	Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/7] dma mapping optimisations
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 09:22:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:05:05PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> The functions are implemented under 'include/linux/', indistinguishable from
> exported APIs. I think I understand why they are there, but they look the same
> as exported functions from a driver perspective.

swiotlb.h is not a driver API.  There's two leftovers used by the drm
code I'm trying to get fixed up, but in general the DMA API is the
interface and swiotlb is just an implementation detail.

> Perhaps I'm being daft, but I'm totally missing why I should care if swiotlb
> leverages this feature. If you're using that, you've traded performance for
> security or compatibility already. If this idea can be used to make it perform
> better, then great, but that shouldn't be the reason to hold this up IMO.

We firstly need to make sure that everything actually works on swiotlb, or
any other implementation that properly implements the DMA API.

And the fact that I/O performance currently sucks and we can fix it on
the trusted hypervisor is an important consideration.  At least as
importantant as micro-optimizing performance a little more on setups
not using them.  So not taking care of both in one go seems rather silly
for a feature that is in its current form pretty intrusive and thus needs
a really good justification.

> This optimization needs to be easy to reach if we expect anyone to use it.
> Working with arbitrary user addresses with minimal additions to the user ABI
> was deliberate. If you want a special allocator, we can always add one later;
> this series doesn't affect that.
> 
> If this has potential to starve system resource though, I can constrain it to
> specific users like CAP_SYS_ADMIN, or maybe only memory allocated from
> hugetlbfs. Or perhaps a more complicated scheme of shuffling dma mapping
> resources on demand if that is an improvement over the status quo.

Or just not bother with it at all.  Because with all those limits it
really does not seems to be worth to an entirely need type of bio
payload to the block layer and a lot of boilerplate to drivers.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-11  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-05 16:24 [PATCHv3 0/7] dma mapping optimisations Keith Busch
2022-08-05 16:24 ` [PATCHv3 1/7] blk-mq: add ops to dma map bvec Keith Busch
2022-08-05 16:24 ` [PATCHv3 2/7] file: " Keith Busch
2022-08-08  0:21   ` Dave Chinner
2022-08-08  1:13     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-08  2:15       ` Dave Chinner
2022-08-08  2:49         ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-08  7:31           ` Dave Chinner
2022-08-08 15:28             ` Keith Busch
2022-08-08 10:14         ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-08-05 16:24 ` [PATCHv3 3/7] iov_iter: introduce type for preregistered dma tags Keith Busch
2022-08-05 16:24 ` [PATCHv3 4/7] block: add dma tag bio type Keith Busch
2022-08-05 16:24 ` [PATCHv3 5/7] io_uring: introduce file slot release helper Keith Busch
2022-08-05 16:24 ` [PATCHv3 6/7] io_uring: add support for dma pre-mapping Keith Busch
2022-08-05 16:24 ` [PATCHv3 7/7] nvme-pci: implement dma_map support Keith Busch
2022-08-09  6:46 ` [PATCHv3 0/7] dma mapping optimisations Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-09 14:18   ` Keith Busch
2022-08-09 18:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-09 16:46   ` Keith Busch
2022-08-09 18:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-10 18:05       ` Keith Busch
2022-08-11  7:22         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-08-31 21:19           ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox