From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 06/19] io-wq: change the io-worker scheduling logic
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 23:27:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
We do io-worker creation when a io-worker gets sleeping and some
condition is met. For uringlet mode, we need to do the scheduling too.
A uringlet worker gets sleeping because of blocking in some place below
io_uring layer in the kernel stack. So we should wake up or create a new
uringlet worker in this situation. Meanwhile, setting up a flag to let
the sqe submitter know it had been scheduled out.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io-wq.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index 212ea16cbb5e..5f54af7579a4 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -404,14 +404,28 @@ static void io_wqe_dec_running(struct io_worker *worker)
{
struct io_wqe_acct *acct = io_wqe_get_acct(worker);
struct io_wqe *wqe = worker->wqe;
+ struct io_wq *wq = wqe->wq;
+ bool zero_refs;
if (!(worker->flags & IO_WORKER_F_UP))
return;
- if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&acct->nr_running))
- return;
- if (!io_acct_run_queue(acct))
- return;
+ zero_refs = atomic_dec_and_test(&acct->nr_running);
+
+ if (io_wq_is_uringlet(wq)) {
+ bool activated;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&wqe->lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ activated = io_wqe_activate_free_worker(wqe, acct);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ raw_spin_unlock(&wqe->lock);
+ if (activated)
+ return;
+ } else {
+ if (!zero_refs || !io_acct_run_queue(acct))
+ return;
+ }
atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 15:27 [RFC 00/19] uringlet Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 01/19] io_uring: change return value of create_io_worker() and io_wqe_create_worker() Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 02/19] io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_URINGLET Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 03/19] io_uring: make worker pool per ctx for uringlet mode Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 04/19] io-wq: split io_wqe_worker() to io_wqe_worker_normal() and io_wqe_worker_let() Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 05/19] io_uring: add io_uringler_offload() for uringlet mode Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 07/19] io-wq: move worker state flags to io-wq.h Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 08/19] io-wq: add IO_WORKER_F_SUBMIT and its friends Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 09/19] io-wq: add IO_WORKER_F_SCHEDULED " Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 10/19] io_uring: add io_submit_sqes_let() Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 11/19] io_uring: don't allocate io-wq for a worker in uringlet mode Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 12/19] io_uring: add uringlet worker cancellation function Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 13/19] io-wq: add wq->owner for uringlet mode Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 14/19] io_uring: modify issue_flags " Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 15/19] io_uring: don't use inline completion cache if scheduled Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 16/19] io_uring: release ctx->let when a ring exits Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 17/19] io_uring: disable task plug for now Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 18/19] io-wq: only do io_uringlet_end() at the first schedule time Hao Xu
2022-08-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 19/19] io_uring: wire up uringlet Hao Xu
2022-08-25 13:03 ` [RFC 00/19] uringlet Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox