public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
To: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Moore <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 21:29:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220827155954.GA11498@test-zns> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2795 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 04:46:18PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>Limit io_uring "cmd" options to files for which the caller has
>Smack read access. There may be cases where the cmd option may
>be closer to a write access than a read, but there is no way
>to make that determination.
>
>Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
>--
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
>index 001831458fa2..bffccdc494cb 100644
>--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
>+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
>@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs_context.h>
> #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
> #include <linux/watch_queue.h>
>+#include <linux/io_uring.h>
> #include "smack.h"
>
> #define TRANS_TRUE	"TRUE"
>@@ -4732,6 +4733,36 @@ static int smack_uring_sqpoll(void)
> 	return -EPERM;
> }
>
>+/**
>+ * smack_uring_cmd - check on file operations for io_uring
>+ * @ioucmd: the command in question
>+ *
>+ * Make a best guess about whether a io_uring "command" should
>+ * be allowed. Use the same logic used for determining if the
>+ * file could be opened for read in the absence of better criteria.
>+ */
>+static int smack_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
>+{
>+	struct file *file = ioucmd->file;
>+	struct smk_audit_info ad;
>+	struct task_smack *tsp;
>+	struct inode *inode;
>+	int rc;
>+
>+	if (!file)
>+		return -EINVAL;
>+
>+	tsp = smack_cred(file->f_cred);
>+	inode = file_inode(file);
>+
>+	smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_PATH);
>+	smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path(&ad, file->f_path);
>+	rc = smk_tskacc(tsp, smk_of_inode(inode), MAY_READ, &ad);
>+	rc = smk_bu_credfile(file->f_cred, file, MAY_READ, rc);
>+
>+	return rc;
>+}
>+
> #endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
>
> struct lsm_blob_sizes smack_blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>@@ -4889,6 +4920,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_IO_URING
> 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_override_creds, smack_uring_override_creds),
> 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_sqpoll, smack_uring_sqpoll),
>+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_cmd, smack_uring_cmd),
> #endif

Tried this on nvme device (/dev/ng0n1).
Took a while to come out of noob setup-related issues but I see that
smack is listed (in /sys/kernel/security/lsm), smackfs is present, and
the hook (smack_uring_cmd) gets triggered fine on doing I/O on
/dev/ng0n1.

I/O goes fine, which seems aligned with the label on /dev/ng0n1 (which
is set to floor).

$ chsmack -L /dev/ng0n1
/dev/ng0n1 access="_"

I ran fio (/usr/bin/fio), which also has the same label.
Hope you expect the same outcome.

Do you run something else to see that things are fine e.g. for
/dev/null, which also has the same label "_".
If yes, I can try the same on nvme side.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-27 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20220719135821epcas5p1b071b0162cc3e1eb803ca687989f106d@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52 ` [PATCH liburing 0/5] Add basic test for nvme uring passthrough commands Ankit Kumar
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220719135832epcas5p31bb7df7c931aba12454b6f16c966a7c8@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52     ` [PATCH liburing 1/5] configure: check for nvme uring command support Ankit Kumar
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220719135834epcas5p2f63a49277322756394f19e23a1c4e4ce@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52     ` [PATCH liburing 2/5] io_uring.h: sync sqe entry with 5.20 io_uring Ankit Kumar
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220719135835epcas5p2284cbb16a28c4290d3a886449bc7a6d8@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52     ` [PATCH liburing 3/5] nvme: add nvme opcodes, structures and helper functions Ankit Kumar
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220719135836epcas5p3f28b20cab964ced538d5a7fdfe367bb4@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52     ` [PATCH liburing 4/5] test: add io_uring passthrough test Ankit Kumar
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220719135837epcas5p1eb4beb20bdfbdaaa7409d7b1f6355909@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52     ` [PATCH liburing 5/5] test/io_uring_passthrough: add test case for poll IO Ankit Kumar
2022-08-12  0:43   ` [PATCH liburing 0/5] Add basic test for nvme uring passthrough commands Casey Schaufler
2022-08-12  1:51     ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 15:33       ` Paul Moore
2022-08-12 16:03         ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-13 11:35           ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-23 23:46         ` [PATCH] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd Casey Schaufler
2022-08-24  0:05           ` Paul Moore
2022-08-24  0:07             ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-26 15:15               ` Paul Moore
2022-08-26 16:53                 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-26 18:59                   ` Paul Moore
2022-08-26 19:04                     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-26 19:10                       ` Paul Moore
2022-08-26 19:31                         ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-27 15:59           ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2022-08-29 16:20             ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-30 13:08               ` Joel Granados
2022-08-30 14:16                 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-31  7:15                   ` Joel Granados

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220827155954.GA11498@test-zns \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox