From: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH for-next v3 0/4] fixed-buffer for uring-cmd/passthrough
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 20:46:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CGME20220902152701epcas5p1d4aca8eebc90fb96ac7ed5a8270816cf@epcas5p1.samsung.com
Hi,
Currently uring-cmd lacks the ability to leverage the pre-registered
buffers. This series adds the support in uring-cmd, and plumbs
nvme passthrough to work with it.
Using registered-buffers showed peak-perf hike from 1.85M to 2.17M IOPS
in my setup.
Without fixedbufs
*****************
# taskset -c 0 t/io_uring -b512 -d128 -c32 -s32 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u1 /dev/ng0n1
submitter=0, tid=5256, file=/dev/ng0n1, node=-1
polled=0, fixedbufs=0/0, register_files=1, buffered=1, QD=128
Engine=io_uring, sq_ring=128, cq_ring=128
IOPS=1.85M, BW=904MiB/s, IOS/call=32/31
IOPS=1.85M, BW=903MiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
IOPS=1.85M, BW=902MiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
^CExiting on signal
Maximum IOPS=1.85M
With fixedbufs
**************
# taskset -c 0 t/io_uring -b512 -d128 -c32 -s32 -p0 -F1 -B1 -O0 -n1 -u1 /dev/ng0n1
submitter=0, tid=5260, file=/dev/ng0n1, node=-1
polled=0, fixedbufs=1/0, register_files=1, buffered=1, QD=128
Engine=io_uring, sq_ring=128, cq_ring=128
IOPS=2.17M, BW=1059MiB/s, IOS/call=32/31
IOPS=2.17M, BW=1057MiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
IOPS=2.16M, BW=1055MiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
^CExiting on signal
Maximum IOPS=2.17M
Patch 1, 3 = prep/infrastructure
Patch 2 = expand io_uring command to use registered-buffers
Patch 4 = expand nvme passthrough to use registered-buffers
This series is prepared on top of:
for-next + iopoll-passthru series [1].
A unified branch is present here:
https://github.com/OpenMPDK/linux/commits/feat/pt_fixedbufs_v3
t/io_uring util with fixedbuf support is here:
https://github.com/joshkan/fio/tree/priv/fb-v3
Changes since v2:
- Kill the new opcode, add a flag instead (Pavel)
- Fix standalone build issue with patch 1 (Pavel)
Changes since v1:
- Fix a naming issue for an exported helper
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/
Anuj Gupta (2):
io_uring: introduce io_uring_cmd_import_fixed
io_uring: introduce fixed buffer support for io_uring_cmd
Kanchan Joshi (2):
block: add helper to map bvec iterator for passthrough
nvme: wire up fixed buffer support for nvme passthrough
block/blk-map.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 38 +++++++++++++------
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
include/linux/io_uring.h | 11 +++++-
include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 9 +++++
io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 29 +++++++++++++-
6 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-02 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220902152701epcas5p1d4aca8eebc90fb96ac7ed5a8270816cf@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-09-02 15:16 ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20220902152706epcas5p11f1a11710a6ba985f4679a5cfe131bf8@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-09-02 15:16 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/4] io_uring: introduce io_uring_cmd_import_fixed Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220902152709epcas5p1a1bd433cac6040c492e347edae484ca5@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-09-02 15:16 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/4] io_uring: introduce fixed buffer support for io_uring_cmd Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-02 23:13 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <CGME20220902152712epcas5p2622e861ac4a5ae9820a9af9442d556b4@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-09-02 15:16 ` [PATCH for-next v3 3/4] block: add helper to map bvec iterator for passthrough Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-02 23:14 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <CGME20220902152717epcas5p26905ce7cb48e9d278976a301d73c297f@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-09-02 15:16 ` [PATCH for-next v3 4/4] nvme: wire up fixed buffer support for nvme passthrough Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-02 16:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/4] fixed-buffer for uring-cmd/passthrough Jens Axboe
2022-09-02 16:32 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-02 18:46 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-02 19:32 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-02 21:25 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-03 9:34 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-03 17:00 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-04 17:01 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-04 20:17 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-05 5:52 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-05 17:48 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox